Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Civic culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:53, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civic culture

~~little more than a dictionary definition.~~ RadioFan (talk) 00:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Give it to Wiktionary.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 01:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have created a stub. The idea is that other Wikipedians will expand upon this stub.... Our friends at Citizendium can provide some ideas as to how the article can be expanded.(http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Civic_culture) Francium12 (talk) 09:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NAD. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - How much more of an article do I need to write? Francium12 (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have now expanded upon my stub Francium12 (talk) 20:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment This still seems like something much more appropriate for a dictionary.--RadioFan (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment I have further expanded the article... Francium12 (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - important subject - Skysmith (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Stubs are improved, not deleted. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are some deletion nominations that I just can't understand. This is obviously a major area of study,[1][2] and we all, as people who are trying to build an encyclopedia rather than knock down others attempts to do so, should be welcoming editors who create articles to fill such glaring holes in our coverage rather than calling for deletion of such articles. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn the subject has potential but this article still needs some attention. Still little more than a dictionary defnition.--RadioFan (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- LOL Attempting to delete an article on a topic that has hundreds of books about it (http://books.google.com/books?q=%22civic+political+culture%22&btnG=Search+Books) Francium12 (talk) 18:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Let's concentrate on working together to build an encyclopedia, rather than ridiculing those who make mistakes. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.