Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Childress Vineyards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy to User:Glane23/Drafts of Articles/Childress_Vineyards. As we have a user who is happy to work on this article and bring it to the required standard, this would appear to be satisfactory concensus here PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 13:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Childress Vineyards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the fact of it being owned by a celebrity sportsperson, article has been cited for lack of sources since 2013. Searches turned up a number of hits, but all in the trivial mention category, for the most part, or in the local paper (which doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. I was actually surprised, as I was going to add citations, at the dearth of available references. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed this nomination using Onel's rationale from this diff. The original nomination failed due to a script error. No comment on the merits. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This seems to be a case of inherited notability, a concept that Wikipedia doesn't accept as a valid criterion for inclusion. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm finding a number of references in gBooks that focus on the wines and the winery rather than the namesake NASCAR driver-owner, such as this example. There are quite a few travel guides and also wine reviews, some of which are only snippets, but whose summaries satisfy notability for the vineyard, the winery and the wines. I'll get back to the article and add some of the better sources when I free up a bit of time. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should the ultimate decision be to delete, please userfy for me as I think, given time and some offline research, I can locate additional sources. I may not be able to get that all done in the timeframe of this discussion, so this note is just in case. Thanks. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches are not actually finding anything better. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy to ~~User:Glane23/Childress_Vineyards~~ if Glane23's happy with that, It looks like it could be saved and improved so if Glane23's happy to work on it still then could be userfied, If not then delete. –Davey2010^Talk 22:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm happy to work on it, but if you do userfy, put it into User:Glane23/Drafts of Articles/Childress_Vineyards, if you don't mind. Thanks, Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.