Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cayenne Klein
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cayenne Klein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG and ENT. None of the biographical data comes from a reliable source Spartaz Humbug! 06:08, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:03, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: The XBIZ Award for Foreign Female Performer of the Year might help to establish some notability for the so far nine (2011…) winners. Klein was 2014: A red or no wikilink on the award page would be ugly. –84.46.53.249 (talk) 09:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- It's not a significant award for ENT and PORNBIO has been depreciated. Spartaz Humbug! 15:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe it is not significant, but it has an enwiki page with wikilinks to 7 of 9 winners, 2018+2019 not yet covered. Is this "not significant" on your say so, or some consensus? If this award would be all you'd have a clear BLP1E. At the moment it could be also a clear
{{Refimprove}}
—only XBIZ+AVN are not good enough, IAFD is no RS—and a PROD if nobody fixes this within, say, a year. I'm not volunteering to fix it, I just stumbled over the name while looking for another AfD, and found the award page. –84.46.53.163 (talk) 01:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe it is not significant, but it has an enwiki page with wikilinks to 7 of 9 winners, 2018+2019 not yet covered. Is this "not significant" on your say so, or some consensus? If this award would be all you'd have a clear BLP1E. At the moment it could be also a clear
- It's not a significant award for ENT and PORNBIO has been depreciated. Spartaz Humbug! 15:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. PORNBIO has been deprecated & there's nothing better. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Article is simply not notable.The Zeus is Ha-Zeus (talk) 21:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.