Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cary Kochman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep or "nomination withdrawn", take your pick. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cary Kochman

I don't think UBS's "Co-Head of Mergers & Acquisitions for IBD Americas" is really notable enough for an article. Yes, he's been quoted by the WSJ once or twice, but I don't see any mainstream coverage of him specifically. See below. —Chowbok ☠ 21:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article should be kept, however more information on the subjects' newsworthy coverage should be added. He is head of Mergers and Acquisitions for the Americas for one of the worlds leading (and still standing) financial institutions UBS AG, and has been cited more often than is reflected in this article. It's not only the WSJ quoting him, but the Financial Times and other sources. As such, information about this person is relevant, especially in today's worldwide financial climate. --Kentcamp (talk) 01:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Being quoted a bunch of time does not establish notability. What is need is coverage in articles that are about the subject rather than quoting the subject. This is behind a pay wall but the Chicago Tribune thinks it significant enough to note his career move. This article establishes the subject as a key hiring. And CBS Marketwatch also took note of him taking on his position at UBS. -- Whpq (talk) 19:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've changed my mind upon reading Whpq's links.—Chowbok ☠ 20:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.