Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Takshila University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:02, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

California Takshila University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, and may not even exist. I have been unable to find any third-party reliable sourcing substantiating the existence of this institution. It's not included on the long California BPPE list of approved institutions at http://www.bppe.ca.gov/schools/approved_schools.shtml and it is has not submitted an annual report to BPPE: https://www.dca.ca.gov/webapps/bppe/annual_report.php . I've received email suggesting that I contact Jennifer Juarez at BPPE to verify the school's registration with BPPE. (But note that an email from BPPE would not create notability.) Orlady (talk) 02:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete pending evidence that the school is actually accredited to issue degrees. That evidence is currently lacking. The school's website [1], while it claims to issue a "master degree," is rather vague about it, and their physical therapy program is forthright in stating that it gives only a two-year associate's degree, after which students will have to go elsewhere to complete their bachelor's. It's possible this "university" exists mainly as a gleam in someone's eye. They don't have an application form[2] or even a physical address that I could find. I found absolutely no coverage at Google News Archive. --MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Accreditation is not necessary for an academic institution to be notable. Unaccredited schools can be notable, based on third-party published documentation. Further, note that the California BPPE officially "approves" many unaccredited schools, so the absence of Takshili from the BPPE lists can be considered unusual. --Orlady (talk) 04:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

True, unaccredited schools can be notable based on WP:GNG; this school fails the GNG standard because it lacks coverage at Google News Archive, as I noted. My mention of accreditation was to see if it might qualify via the "automatic notability" standard for accredited degree-granting institutions; without evidence of accreditation it does not. --MelanieN (talk) 14:15, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable although it may become notorious; mentioned in blogs as a school to not attend because it lacks accreditation.[3] Unable to find mention of this school in a reliable source. DocTree (talk) 04:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to fail WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.