Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.Krishniah Chetty & Sons
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- C.Krishniah Chetty & Sons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No indication of notability. I can't find anything on a English language webtrawl that would show much notability, most things seem to be press releases, which aren't independent. --GedUK 15:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm thinking probably delete on this one. If the claims (140 year old legendary jewelry company ... patronage in the Royal families ... finest jewelry deigns in the world) in the lead paragraph are true, you'd think there would be dozens, if not hundreds, of sources, spanning decades, that would verify and show notability for this company. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Weak keep - Phil Bridger was able to find sources where I wasn't. While still not very significant coverage, it's enough for a weak keep from me. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 21:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 16:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. But would you expect those dozens or hundreds of sources to be readily available online? Phil Bridger (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Actually it turns out that there are dozens (if not hundreds) of sources readily available online. I've added some to the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notability established by content and sources added by User:Phil Bridger. Nice rescue! Abecedare (talk) 07:15, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.