Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Kelly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 01:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Kelly

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meetsWP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, and Washington, D.C.. Owen× ☎ 19:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arizona, Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to add some more sources from his time in Phoenix, which may qualify him. Some of his career stops seem less than notable, though. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 23:43, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The many trivial details in this overlong article obscurEs the fact that his career has been fairly prominent, and sources for notability can almost certainly be found. Llajwa (talk) 00:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.