Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgette Raes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgette Raes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any WP:SIGCOV or otherwise in depth coverage of her - it's mostly one liners "fashionista/expert Raes says wear this!" and interviews. Also fails NAUTHOR as her books don't seem to have any professional reviews or coverage. Praxidicae (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 15:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 15:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. The sustained WP:SIGCOV of her or her literature is just not there. I would also add that this article was created by a single purpose account, which raises the specter of an undisclosed COI as the basis of this article. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.