Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Raider

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 09:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Raider

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking secondary references of substance. Fails WP:BIO and associated notability guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 00:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:CREATIVE LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. There's not a single reliable source in the article. Most producers really don't fail into WP:CREATIVE. Often they are just investors or middle managers at a TV studio, and are thus extremely common. For that reason, almost all producers whose articles end up at AfD have been deleted. Otherwise, we'd be a mirror of IMdB. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.