Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Dunhill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Dunhill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent reliable sources cover this individual. References fail WP:RS as they are all promotional. The article appears to be a vanity page and purely promotional, which Wikipedia does not do WP:PROMO. Does not meet high standards for sourcing WP:BLP. Fails GNG and BIO. Steve Quinn (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Concur completely with nom. Promotional article without independent RS. MB 03:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per above - David Gerard (talk) 15:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional article on a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional piece which is almost WP:G11-worthy. No reliable sources found, doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Omni Flames (talk) 08:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly a vanity page, and no indications of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.