Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brant Imperatore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brant Imperatore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not now describe a person who qualifies as notable under Wikipedia's guidelines. The article currently reads more as advertising than encyclopedia. Avocats (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. There is nothing notable about him, the only links on him are a Fox Business search results page and a ISDA page for him. It indeed does sound more like propagranda than a encyclopedia entry. SwisterTwister (talk) 05:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Google News Archive finds only passing mentions of this congressional-staffer-turned-lobbyist. --MelanieN (talk) 16:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find substantive coverage in reliable sources. Hekerui (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.