Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boondocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:34, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Boondocks

Dictionary definition with uncontroversial etymology, sourced only to other dictionaries, no hope of expansion. Delete and move Boondocks (disambiguation) to this title. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - an article isn't necessary for a dictionary word. Henrymrx (t·c) 21:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Agreed. Part definition, part alternative disambig page. And boondocks is not a geographical term...--Junius49 (talk) 22:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A cursory Google search shows non-trivial coverage beyond dictionaries, with potential for the expansion of the article. I have added some of these references to the article; there are more. A little due diligence in future, please. Skomorokh 05:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A concept, not a word. A significant one, with sources in the article and no problem gfinding more. Needs expansion, not deletion.DGG (talk) 07:08, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agree with DGG. older ≠ wiser 03:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unless this can be turned into an article about a 'thing', which it isn't at the moment, there's nothing here that shouldn't be in Wiktionary. It's a pure dicdef.--Michig (talk) 12:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources introduced by Skomorokh. Per DGG its a concept, a perceived condition of "rural-ness" and "yokel-ness" , not just a dicdef. FeydHuxtable (talk) 14:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with DGG, it a concept not just a word. Dream Focus 03:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article is sufficiently developed to be more than a dicdef. Artw (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support/Delete -- per WP:DICDEF DreamGuy (talk) 02:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.