Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombay Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IAR close. The nomination has been withdrawn and discussion has moved to Talk:Bombay_Time_(time_zone)#Requested_move_2_April_2015. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bombay Time

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~DAB page where only one article belongs now (since the other was deleted Wgolf (talk) 20:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)~~ withdrawn[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as Housekeeping, and move Bombay Time (time zone) -> Bombay Time. Abecedare (talk) 21:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 1st entry does meet MOS:DABMENTION and there is a very similar see also I've added. I think it is borderline whether this should be a requested move Bombay Time to Bombay Time (disambiguation), and the time zone put at the primary, or just establish time zone as primary with hatnote(s). Boleyn (talk) 08:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: No need for a dab page: add both hatnote links to the time zone article and move it to the base name (ie Boleyn's 2nd option). Needs to be a formal WP:RM of the time zone article, I suppose. PamD 09:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have added the hatnotes to Bombay Time (time zone). @Wgolf: would you like to withdraw the nomination so we can put this up at WP:RM? (I'd have done it myself but I think it probably gets complicated to have an AfD and a RM going on simlutaneously) PamD 09:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn-Done! Wgolf (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks: RM now at Talk:Bombay Time (time zone) PamD 16:42, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up comment: "Keep" doesn't seem quite accurate as a description of the outcome here. As I understand it, the outcome is to move the discussion to Talk:Bombay Time (time zone), where an RM request has been opened. The outcome of that RM might confirm the suggestion to delete the dab page that was the topic of this AfD. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note self reverted NAC closure after the above comment.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.