Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolsomito 2K18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jair Bolsonaro presidential campaign, 2018. Sandstein 19:48, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bolsomito 2K18 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Controversial little game about president-elect of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro. The article was deleted in the portuguese Wikipedia due to lack of notability Holy Goo (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, actually it was merged into the article of the campaign, in the section "controversies". There is an english version of that article, Jair Bolsonaro presidential campaign, 2018. It could be merged there too but ir might qualify as undue weight. Holy Goo (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep First, notability guidelines differ on the various language wikipedias, so what one does doesn't affect another. I agree this article is short, and it will likely never reach the normal approach we use for video games, but there is still ongoing issues related to the current gov't investigation into this game. I'm not against merging it somewhere, it is a likely search term now, but I think we should judge if in a few months no other news about the investigation comes out. --Masem (t) 15:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I shall spell it out. I am alluding to the notability guideline, which states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Axl ¤ [Talk] 17:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline also says "Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have a stand-alone article. I think this is a case where the WP:NOPAGE part of the guideline applies ("Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page "). Regards SoWhy 14:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.