Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bnei Baruch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 03:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bnei Baruch

Utter and shameless self-promotion. Reads like a detailed and seductive "come hither, my dear" brochure. Violates Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines; Wikipedia is not a soapbox; and WP:NN. This new organization is not notable according to any stream of Judaism, and in fact its website says that its founder and leader is not even a rabbi!: "The title “Rav” was given to Dr. Laitman by his students in respect for his teachings and his dedication to spreading the wisdom of Kabbalah throughout the world. Rav Laitman was not ordained as a rabbi by a rabbinical school and does not serve as an orthodox rabbi." see bottom of his home page. Almost all the information about this organization on Google is generated by their websites or by sites that mirror this article. The article about its founder Michael Laitman is also nominated for deletion for the same reasons. Other articles, such as the one about Rabbi Baruch Ashlag have been loaded to "retroactively" promote Michael Laitman and his organization. Note: The same self-promoting editors have "snuck in" Laitman's quotes into Wikiquote, which should also be nominated for deletion for the above reasons. Thank you, IZAK 05:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the above reasons. IZAK 05:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. Geocities is for this sort of thing. Evolver of Borg 06:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, Wikipedia is neither a soapbox nor a free webhost. --Coredesat talk 07:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Gilgamesh he 07:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete good nom, IZAK Ð’n^talk 07:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; WP:VAIN, WP:BIO, and WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox--TBCTaLk?!? 07:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 12:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since it's obviously professionally written. - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete commercial, agree with Czrussian. --Daniel575 13:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The anonymous writer of the article just deleted all contents except for the deletion notice. --Daniel575 13:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I put it back. That shouldn't be done during an AFD, unless you think that this qualifies as a speedy delete (Template:Db-author).Jon513 15:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comments at "Michael Laitman": WP:WING, WP:NOT, WP:OR, WP:VANITY, etc. Avi 17:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. --Shuki 17:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No question about it. gidonb 17:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. JFW | T@lk 21:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like an advert. SpeechFreedom 00:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Starionwolf 04:10, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, brouchureCruft... —Hanuman Das 17:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --רח"ק | Talk 20:29, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity per IZAK. 172 | Talk 19:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Reads like promotional materials, no effort at NPOV or WP:RS. See WP:CB --Shirahadasha 03:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.