Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibiana Boerio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bibiana Boerio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Nothing in this person's life meets a notability guideline and sourcing is sparse. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passed WP:GNG before she ever ran for office. Interim president of Seton Hill University[1], nominated to be director of the United States Mint[2], managing directory of Jaguar Cars[3]. Pburka (talk) 21:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That's all I found, too. Far short of GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Each of those is significant coverage in reliable sources. Those alone are enough for GNG, but there's also quite a bit more on Highbeam. She was covered pretty extensively in local British newspapers when she managed Jaguar. Google doesn't have much coverage there. (Personally, I wouldn't use PROD if I'd found even one these sources. PROD should be used only for non-controversial deletions.) Pburka (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    e.g. "Bibiana heads back for Big Cat territory", Coventry Evening Telegraph, "Bibie in Jag hot seat", Liverpool Echo, "New face in driving seat for Jaguar: Car maker's first woman MD steps down", Birmingham Mail, "We Want Customers to Think 'Gorgeous' about Jaguars: Company Chairman Speaks on the Luxury Car Maker's New Brands and Ad Campaign Hopes", Coventry Evening Telegraph Pburka (talk) 00:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as noted above, there seems to enough coverage of the subject to pass GNG. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:01, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- That is not enough coverage. That third source is about Jaguar, not Boerio. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That particular entry isn't useful but other coverage such as Post Gazette and TribLive does cover her substantially. Our entry can easily be expanded. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they do. TribLive has a little coverage, but much of it seems to be about the election rather than Boerio. Post Gazette has far fewer mentions. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect she doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG and no harm in redirecting to the election page. SportingFlyer talk 02:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- She does not pass WP:NPOL nor is she notable for her position as president of Seton Hill University. WP:NACADEMIC specifies that it only applies to heads of major academic institutions, Seton Hill is not major.--Rusf10 (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- What about the significant coverage in reliable sources from her time leading Jaguar? Pburka (talk) 19:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a few more citations to the article. This candidate has received more coverage than typical campaign announcements. She has an executive profile on Bloomberg from her previous work.[4] She received significant coverage about her candidacy announcement, then received more significant coverage after winning the Democratic primary. She was recently profiled by the New York Times.[5] Considering she just won the nomination a week or two ago and has already received this much significant coverage, I don't see any reason to delete this article. It seems the coverage will almost certainly continue to intensify as we approach the election, and the article already passes WP:GNG for significant coverage in secondary sources. Lonehexagon (talk) 02:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am seeing enough reliable coverage to meet WP:GNG. --RAN (talk) 18:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep University president and soon to be congressperson = GNG pass. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 21:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I added a couple of references, including a long profile in London's Observer. Among the additions, I note that she was the first woman to serve on Jaguar's board of directors and was a C-level executive there. I'm not sure there is an NPEOPLE subheading for business executives, but I think she seems encyclopedic. The article itself seems to me to satisfy WP:CCPOL. Smmurphy^(Talk) 12:40, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Neutral point of view and verifiable; received significant coverage after winning primary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerikat (talk • contribs) 13:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sourcing of per-politician career carries her past WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per E.M.Gregory and other above keep arguments.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - GNG pass. PhilKnight (talk) 22:29, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.