Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Tosh (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bert Tosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't satisfy WP:BIO as a BBC radio producer. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Northern Ireland. Shellwood (talk) 10:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - does not show evidence of notability, appears to fail both WP:BIO and WP:GNG. SeoR (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I found this through the academic deletion sorting list but I can find no evidence of notability as an academic scholar of religion, nor even evidence that he has ever been an academic scholar of religion. So we would have to go through our notability standards for media religionists, basically WP:GNG. But a news search turns up nothing of interest there, either. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.