Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barangays of Navotas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Navotas#Barangays. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:48, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Barangays of Navotas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this page without right thinking. Also this page and I (who created it) are marred by the "debate" at its talk page. I think things will go better if this page goes deleted, as part of my process of semi-retiring. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Would all the information fit in Navotas#Barangays or can you expand the article to be like all the others of its type listed at Category:Lists of barangays in Philippine cities and municipalities? Dream Focus 02:43, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article only needs some cleanup, but it's good enough to be kept with reliable sources indicated there. Its portion can be summarized. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect/merge to Navotas#Barangays. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 08:26, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect (with no prejudice towards recreation at a later date if the situation warrants it). This article has some information and sources that should be added to Navotas whatever the decision here. The table here is more informative (although we don't need to merge the decorative pictures and the 2010 column should be left of the 2015 column), and the former barangays have sources here whereas they are unsourced in the Navotas article. Given the current short length of both these articles, the information here would easily fit within the scope of Navotas. It can be split off if it expands to detail that would be undue for the Navotas article. CMD (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.