Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audio Science Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Audio Science Review

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. No significant coverage. I love how it says "In 2020, ASR became notable" with the reference being an unreliable blog. Fails WP:WEB. SL93 (talk) 23:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 23:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 23:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:N or WP:WEB. I only see WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS when searching for sources. TipsyElephant (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 00:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.