Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassin bug (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka ^t•c 13:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assassin bug (Dungeons & Dragons)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor D&D monster. No secondary sources cited, no decent sources identified in a search. No evidence of notability. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, only in-universe sources. Geschichte (talk) 19:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no indication of real-life significance. Not a very active user (talk) 12:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Only primary sources are being used here, and the only reliable sources found upon searches is on the real world insects known as assassin bugs. Changing the hatnote on that page to direct to the monster list, if actually deemed necessary, would be a much better way to direct what few people would be looking specifically for the fictional version of the creatures than keeping this as a redirect, which would be a lot less common of a search term. Rorshacma (talk) 16:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.