Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun Sen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 11:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun Sen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial references, no notability. started and mainly written by now banned promotional editor DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO. Just another puffed-up resume created by spammers. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 04:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO paid promotional article written by indef blocked user.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now as my searches found nothing particularly good with the best results being this, this and this. SwisterTwister talk 06:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete yet another obviously paid-for corp exec vanity bio. Really scraping the bottom of the barrel for notability (childrearing advice in Deseret News?!), but ends up failing. Brianhe (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:48, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Marketers got to market, I guess, but we don't need to provide them a platform. No evidence of passing WP:GNG or other notability criteria such as WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.