Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aram James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aram James

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It appears that from 2005 to 2007 the subject was mentioned in local newspapers and alternative weeklies for attending city council meetings and speaking out against the use of tasers. His views do not seem to have been reported on outside of the local area and I can find no significant coverage in reliable sources that would shed light on the usual biographical details. Fails WP:NOT#NEWS. Concerns regarding WP:SOAPBOX given history of the article's creator: 2011 SPI, 2013 SPI. Location (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete, the subject has received multiple mentions in non-primary reliable sources, however it does not appear that the subject has received significant coverage in any of those mentions; at the same time I can see the arguement that all of those mentions added together may be considered one significant coverage source. That being said, it is my view that multiple significant coverage reliable sources indicate clear notability. As the subject's notability is unclear to me at this I will weakly support deletion, and maybe persuaded to change my opinion given proper evidence being presented.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.