Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 11:45, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha'

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. ——🦝 The Interaccoonale ^{Will be the raccoon race}_{(talk・contribs)} 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. ——🦝 The Interaccoonale ^{Will be the raccoon race}_{(talk・contribs)} 16:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per linked AfD - these species are essentially taxonomic phantoms that can never be nailed down now that they are extinct. No basis for an article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:12, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is a sufficient reference. See also the references in https://recentlyextinctspecies.com/fishes/aplocheilichthys-sp-nov-naivasha
- Hanssens, M. (2004a). Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha'. In: IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. (http://www.iucnredlist.org). Downloaded on 04 May 2013.
- Hanssens, M. (2004b). Aplocheilichthys sp. nov. 'Naivasha'. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T61225A12451418. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T61225A12451418.en. Downloaded on 27 June 2021.
- Seegers, L., De Vos, L. and Okeyo, D. O. (2003). Annotated checklist of the freshwater fishes of Kenya (excluding the lacustrine haplochromines from Lake Victoria). Journal of East African Natural History 92: 11-47. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organisms and Kenya. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above. Only formally described species are considered automatically notable, and this fails GNG and SIGCOV besides. SilverTiger12 (talk) 04:33, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.