Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Trudeau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Charmed characters. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Trudeau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even though this character was a primary/featured character on a major show, I could not locate enough information to support that he has received significant coverage in third-party, reliable sources. Fails WP:FICT, WP:NOTE, and WP:RS. Limited evidence of independent notability and all references to this appear to be limited to plot summary. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Charmed characters, where he is already included. Like the nominator stated, there is really little in the way of reliable sources discussing the character; searches just bring up the usual fansites and wikis, but nothing discussing the character in any meaningful way past plot summary. It seems like the character was dropped pretty quickly, being killed off in the first season, so that is probably why there is not much in the way of coverage. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response! I agree that the character's early departure from the series probably is the main reason why there is not much in the way of coverage. Aoba47 (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.