Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allie Teilz

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allie Teilz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines and thus I don't believe she merits her own WP article. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG, WP:NMODEL, and WP:MUSICBIO. 11 sources are namedropping celebrity boyfriends WP:NOTINHERITED, the rest are primary, passing mentions, interviews, promotional, or fail WP:RS, with the exception of the one WWD article. I don't have access (paywall), but it might actually meet WP:RS. Of course, that's still only one source. Orville1974 (talk) 22:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep there is enough coverage for me to parse that she is a musician and model, and has launched a fashion line. The coverage is not insignificant, nor significant. It's somewhere in between. I do think it tips towards keep.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:18, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple sources on the internet providing a decade of work in music and fashion. Verified intagram and facebook profiles. Keep. ~~Arlobutt (talk)~~ 00:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.131.205.94 (talk) [reply]
Note regarding unsigned vote above - User:Arlobutt (the entry above this one) does not exist, and the autosigned keep !vote above was registered by IP 157.131.205.94 as the only edit the user has ever made. Orville1974 (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - looks to be a WP:NMODEL failure by default, as no sources indicate how the subject has met the criteria laid down by said policy. As for WP:GNG, trivial or in passing mentions do not convince me the subject has accrued enough significant coverage to meet GNG.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:11, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SamHolt6 and Orville1974. Geoffroi (talk) 17:00, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Wikipedia entries span the rich, the famous; the poor, the unaccomplished; the forgotten, the esoteric and the unforgettable. Whether an entry is deleted ought not be because of subjective tastes of few editors. This particular entry merits saving due to cultural significance and well-earned respect among musicians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:900A:1A07:7E33:1409:B52D:E7DF:C17A (talk) 01:37, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's nice but we do not go by those kinds of arguments. Read WP:N to see what kinds of arguments are valid here.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:43, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep *Allie Teilz is a great and famous DJ who has been working as model too, and has created her own design clothing label She has a lot of reputation in her activities, working with others famous DJs, and in parties and other shows in several places in the world. She is enothly known in the industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.136.123.247 (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is really nice. Repeatedly adding the same sort of anonymous comments like this, that say she is famous and great and has a great reputation, will not help at all. We go by sources. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:29, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Allie Teilz is one of the world's leading female deejays and upcoming designers. She has a strong International fan base and is one of the leading women in her industry. Sources added above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.178.0.166 (talk) 20:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as is obvious, all the full keep votes are SPA's that have a scant understanding of the policies. There is likely socking going on here.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not seeing any evidence of notability. The sources I have access to are interviews with the subject, or blogs, or do no more than mention her, or don't even mention her. No "significant discussion" in independent sources, as required. Maproom (talk) 21:42, 10 June 2019 (UTC--110.93.214.36 (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)--110.93.214.36 (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)--110.93.214.36 (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC))[reply]
Delete. After checking, it seems that the subject of this biographical article does not meet notability requirements of WP:GNG, WP:NMODEL, or WP:MUSICBIO. Netherzone (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Interesting to note that the past seven unsigned keep-!votes were made by the same SPA, Anand Kumar Khatri. Netherzone (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I just reverted the mass delete done by Anand Kumar Khatri of not only their comments, but those of other editors as well. Orville1974 (talk) 19:28, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please don't get me wrong, but I have some questions. I'm just wondering why the page has already been deleted. I know it was tagged for speedy deletion, but can't you give me some time to improve the page? Moreover, the page was deleted in 2019, so I guess it's fine to recreate it since it has been more or less two years since the first one. Again, please don't get me wrong; I'm just trying to understand everything here. Thank you.Aona1212 (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think i have done my research as well i think this should not be deleted, as i think its great to have new stars and talent on wikipedia.!--110.93.214.36 (talk) 21:26, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.