Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance University

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meets the WP:N criteria, the references used are also unreliable or are by the university themselves (for example their website). Ratnahastin (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Ratnahastin (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to removal of references. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. University established under state legislation. We have usually kept these. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It appears to be a proper university, but it needs a serious cleanup to remove a load of puffery. --Bduke (talk) 01:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a start on a cleanup, but it needs work from someone nearer to it who has access to sources. --Bduke (talk) 02:12, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

significant copyvio, including from here so will need massive cleanup and probably rev del if kept. I don't want to gut it which would affect assessment while at AfD Star Mississippi 01:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing this out, apparently most of the article's content is copied verbatim from their own websites. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:32, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It may be open source and suitably licenced for sharing. I know a lot of them do that but worth checking. scope_creep^Talk 10:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any language releasing the content on their pages. Since it appears likely to be kept and this won't impact assessment here, I'm going to stub it back on those grounds. Noting here for transparency. Star Mississippi 13:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the ancient rev dels were not me, those had been done. I just handled what had been added this month. There seems to be some feuding in the history that I can't make heads or tails of. Star Mississippi 13:31, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Its is a real university with real degrees awarded and real people studying there. Passses WP:GNG. The article needs work and copyedit but not Afd. scope_creep^Talk 10:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a real university. I can't see why it wouldn't pass WP:GNG or WP:N. It's a very short article now that the copyvio is gone, but it's not a bad article. Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 20:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.