Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance EPP: European People's Party UK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the party meets GNG. (non-admin closure) Enos733 (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance EPP: European People's Party UK

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a Gazetteer of political parties. Former AfD nominee. Nothing has happened since to prove notability or importance. No notable or important election results . doktorb _words^deeds 09:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 09:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. doktorb _words^deeds 09:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Nominator has previously nominated numerous articles for deletion as part of his continuing campaign to delete all minor parties from Wikipedia. If his nomination is not succesful, he will be back again in a few months with another nomination, and another. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4 Freedoms Party (UK EPP) which was unsuccessful includes a partial list of his target articles, including this in 2014. Nothing has changed since. Emeraude (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And, as the niminator says, nothing has happened since the previous AfD to justify bringing another. Emeraude (talk) 15:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per the in-depth coverage from sources such as EurActiv, BBC and Europolitics. I have recently argued in favour of deletion at several AfDs relating to minor parties lacking such coverage. For me, this party clears the sourcing bar. AusLondonder (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. To my surprise I seem to be the major contributor to this article. In fact much of the content of the article is actually unrelated to this micro party, including content I added myself. When I looked up information for it, this party did not seem to be much more than a single bloke with a Tweeter feed. On the plus side, it did stand candidates in London for EU Parliament elections once, gathering a meagre 28,000 votes, and got some press coverage for this feat. Place Clichy (talk) 07:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kept at AfD back in 2014. "Nothing has happened since to prove notability or importance." is irrelevant as editors felt the subject already met WP:GNG back in 2014. NemesisAT (talk) 14:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.