Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Akbar (designer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Akbar (designer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to met WP:Notability (people). I may be struggling to see notability because of the advert-style tone set by WP:SPA creator, but I couldn't establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (yak) @ 12:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Highly promotional article about a photographer. Subject would seem to fail WP:ARTIST and WP:BASIC. Of the cited sources only the first meets the standards expected when assessing notability for BLPs. Unfortunately one good source is not enough. A Google search was challenging due to the apparently common nature of the name, but did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete very borderline notability at best, and clearly promotion. DGG ( talk ) 09:03, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.