Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan G. Gross
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:SNOW Keep. NAC. Schuym1 (talk) 13:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Alan G. Gross (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:NOTE OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 02:33, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per notability (WP:CREATIVE) as author and educator. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A googlescholar search (which is usually absolutely terrible in fishing out citations in humanities) gives significant results for him[1], in particular with 348 cites for his book "The rhetoric of science". Googlebooks search results are also impressive 296 hits[2]. I also did some searching in WorldCat, which is mainly a book holdings search but also has some (rather incomplete) data about journal articles. There are 27 journal articles listed there with reviews of his work[3], including review articles called "Rereading Aristotle's Rhetoric, Alan Gross and Arthur Walzer"[4] and the like. This already tells me that he is quite a notable figure in his field. Clearly passes criterion 1 of WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 03:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cool! He's a two-fer! Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:46, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep per Nsk92. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Clearly passes WP:PROF. — neuro(talk) 11:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.