Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advit Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:45, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advit Foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable NGO/Trust. Seems to have been made by someone close to the organisation. Apart from passing mentions in newspapers, there seems to be nothing else to impart notability Jupitus Smart 07:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 07:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 07:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree per nom. Fails WP:GNG and is purely promotional. Skirts89 (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:37, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough reliable sources are found for the subject. Does not pass GNG.--Mhhossein ^talk 11:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with the nominator that this article is promotional and that the organisation does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.