Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achille Salata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Achille Salata

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Okay, withdrawing nomination, more than enough sources have been added. I could not find those before. Staglit (talk) 20:30, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fails notability guidline, and the whole article is plagarized from here (http://www.cyclopaedia.info/wiki/Achille-Salata) anyway. Staglit (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Methinks the former editor has suffered loss of conscious effort, most likely due to cognitive lassitude. It is an entirely repairable disorder, merely requiring adding joules to noggin. Either that, or he lies. Cyclopaedia openly attributes their article to plagiarism of my entry which initially was derived from Angelo De Gubernatis encyclopedia. Look it up. I have added further substantiation to why I think Achille Salata should be maintained, but we could easily just wait 120 years, and see whether his name endures in museums or books, versus mine own or that of the author above. Sorry for the sarcasm, but again, my concern is that I should have to do this at all. That I should have to work more than editors have to when they just wish to delete. A more apt appraisal of the entity would have said perhaps more references were needed, etc. It has become a structural problem of Wikipedia. It is time to make deletion a more difficult thing to do, than substantiation of an entry regarding a biographical figure from over 100 years ago, who is cited in a catalogue of artists from that century.Rococo1700 (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.