Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Razak Mohaideen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Person seems non-notable (100 google results), went 2 months with zero references or any verifiable information added. Should be deleted. Plus, IMDb profile contains only 2 films and no info. Wizardman 01:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- k: Tag for cleanup and references instead Akihabara 02:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been tagged for months on both cleanup and references, as well as wikification. Those would be hard to acomplish with so little information on him. --Wizardman 02:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails both WP:BIO and WP:PROF, and w/ 2 IMDb hits, doesn't look like it would pass either. SkierRMH 02:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 05:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above concerns. — Seadog 16:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete searched with Arabic, no results. ← ANAS Talk? 19:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletions. -- ⇒ bsnowball 11:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)"[reply]
- Keep & possibly just stub it (that appears to be an essay just c&pasted). regards this nomination, 2 mnths with those templates obviously not enough when the wit who put them there didn't bother categorising it, please note this, article wasn't brought to the attention of anyone who might know the area (i've {{Malaysia-bio-stub}}ed it & found 1 relevant category. please pay more attention & remember WP:BIAS. also, anas, arabic not the best language to search for malaysian films/directors ⇒ bsnowball 15:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. While it does need citations, being neglected is not a reason for deletion. Someone who has made 20 films that have grossed that much in that area of the world certainly seems notable to me. Mus Musculus 13:31, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note, I have begun to clean this up and add references. If you voted delete, please review the article and reconsider that I am willing to work on it. Mus Musculus 13:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks a lot better now. I'll Withdraw my deletion vote for now and just ask that it be closed as a no consensus. It actually looks like an encyclopedia article now. --Wizardman 15:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note, I have begun to clean this up and add references. If you voted delete, please review the article and reconsider that I am willing to work on it. Mus Musculus 13:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per WP:BIAS __earth (Talk) 07:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.