Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABC (block cipher)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ABC (block cipher)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I can verify the author's involvement in the cryptographic community, there is no indication for notability of the algorithm at all. Note: Not to be confused with ABC (stream cipher), ABC (Accumulated Block Chaining), and ABC (Advanced Block Cipher). Honest statement by the author in his paper: "The author assumes that the expanded SAFER diffusion layer is MDS (Maximum Distance Separable) which, if proven, would be the only new thing in this paper." – Suggest deletion. Nageh (talk) 23:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm the article's creator. I understand notability better now than I did back when I wrote it. I've never been able to find even one secondary source discussing the subject. It shouldn't be here—sorry. Ntsimp (talk) 01:14, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 21:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of independent coverage. There are very few hits in Google scholar for this, and most of them seem to lead back through Wikipedia, so I was unable to find anything that would function as an adequate source. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.