User talk:Zutt

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Zutt. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Zutt~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

04:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Billy Meier

Please desist from adding unsourced and poorly sourced content to Billy Meier. Wikipedia articles should only include content from reliable, secondary sources. Self-serving self-published work does not meet this criterion by a long shot. If you continue to add this material, it will continue to be removed. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that IIG and the Center for Inquiry in general are considered reliable sources on the subject of paranormal investigations (by Wikipedia editors, mass media, and professional debunkers). Billy Meier and his witnesses have no such reputation. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's so special about publishing a book? Heck, I have a published book you can buy right now. Publishing a book is not especially hard. Anyone can start a publication and claim to be a reliable source. Reputation is harder to come by. If you want to press this issue, I highly recommend you take your source to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and see if any editors agree it is a reliable source. I'll abide by any decision that comes out of such a discussion. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well that one is easy, actually. The article on Jesus does not use the bible as a source. Our article instead relies upon the vast body of biblical scholarship that has been produced by historians and other experts. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than welcome to voice your opinions on Talk:Jesus and see if you can change the consensus there. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:28, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm LuckyLouie. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Billy Meier, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 08:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:LEGAL for more info. You may consider to discuss your WP:BLP concerns on the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Thanks JimRenge (talk) 08:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 15:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Editing on your own or someone else's behalf

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for more information.

Wikipedia's policy on how to handle material about living persons, biographies of living persons, applies to every page on the project, including talk pages. If Wikipedia has published material about you, or someone you represent, and you need help, you can:

post a correction on the article's talk page and ask that it be implemented;
ask for assistance at the biographies of living persons noticeboard;
place {{adminhelp}} on your user talk page, which will attract an administrator;
contact the Wikimedia Foundation's team of volunteers at info-en-q@wikimedia.org, with a link to the page and details of the problem.

`

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zutt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The caretaker for the Billy Meier page is simply taking revenge for me pointing out a few gross defamatory entries about Mr. Meier. Realising that he has no valid arguments supporting his breaches of privacy rights after me citing actual Swiss law – something which can obviously lead to lawyers getting involved, he goes the easy way by silencing me, and thus even preventing me from filing a report on issues regarding biographies of living persons Zutt (talk) 13:37, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Articles (not pages) do not have officially designated caretakers. Editors may participate at any article they wish. You used the threat of legal action(a subpoena) as a cudgel in a discussion. To be unblocked, you must agree to stop bringing up the possibility of legal action and agree to pursue your grievances according to Wikipedia guidelines. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zutt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are defining the purpose of an appeal as me coming forward and writing “oh I have been wrong and you have been right all along”? Please reread my words, I had done exactly two things: 1) reminded us that the Wikipedia information pages are leaving the path of external jurisdiction as an option in accordance with US law, 2) I stated that in all likelihood Billy Meier will not go that far. Which lawyer would possibly call that a “threat of legal action (a subpoena)? Sorry, but that argumentation is ridiculous. Zutt (talk) 02:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. SQL ^{Query Me!} 04:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.