User talk:Zuggernaut

WIKI-MOKSHA

This user has attained Moksha from Wikipedia.

Civility barnstar

		Civility Award
		For the civil behaviour while being under persistent, one sided attacks, almost everywhere, by the same two or three people. One can certainly learn from your example.

78.228.238.6 (talk) 14:32, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your detailed analysis of a website, thereby helping the other editors in reaching a consensus on pakdef.info at wp:RSN Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:19, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another one

		The NPOV Barnstar of Merit
		Strong work Zuggernaut defeating the POV warriors at wp:RSN Wikireader41 (talk) 23:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
		_{This WikiAward was given to Zuggernaut by Wikireader41 (talk) on 23:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)}[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar

Thank you very much. I'm relieved that our differences on India have not soured things between us! I look forward to working with you again on that and other articles. AshLin (talk) 02:34, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that thought never crossed my mind. For me, what happens at an article stays there and doesn't spill over to other articles. For the most part, the India article itself is just fine and even getting better but it is an exception in one area. Nonetheless, I cannot foresee any unsolvable disagreements with you or greater than 99.8% of the 2500 watchers/editors either at the India article or elsewhere. And given that almost all of the editors you and I interact with stick to the top of the pyramid on the right, what's to worry about? Zuggernaut (talk) 15:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage editwar

You had no place to reinstate the comment on my talkpage. What ever the interpretation you have about the talkpage guidelines, I'm quoting from the same page that you linked:

"Personal talk page cleanup: On your own user talk page, you may archive threads at your discretion. Simply deleting others' comments on your talk page is permitted, but most editors prefer archiving. Many new users believe they can hide critical comments by deleting them. This is not true: Such comments can always be retrieved from the page history. Removal of a comment is taken as proof that the user has read it."

With some other editors doing the same recently I might be out of patience for this specific matter, so consider this as the only warning/notification for your action. --lTopGunl (talk) 04:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard citations

Hi Zuggernaut. I think this [1] might be of interest to you. I, for one, found it extremely useful.MW ^ℳ 09:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly something I was looking for. I will install it soon, thanks for letting me know. Zuggernaut (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Ucucha...:-) MW ^ℳ 14:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why ANI?

I wonder why you have taken your topic-ban review to the ANI. The ANI is a completely useless place. It is stuffed with limeys who have written British-Indian history articles from a whitewased British POV and are committed to keeping it that way. They can't have these articles written from NPOV. They are never going to take off the editing restrictions.MW ^ℳ 11:21, 20 November 2011 (UTC) You are probably not aware of this, but recently, there was an admin user who was even talking about euthanasia for you at user talk:Fowler&fowler. And when I and one other user protested, the admin user even claimed that the protests were somehow wrong!!! Nothing wrong with what the admin user said!!! That is the level of their necessity to keep those articles whitewashed. In this situation, what can you expect from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents‎‎.MW ^ℳ 11:59, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are some "POV-apples" out there but generalization is not a good idea. I took it to ANI because it is quick. All avenues should work with equal fairness for all if Wikipedia wants to remain relevant. Yes, I am aware of that conversation. Zuggernaut (talk) 03:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about BJP youth wing protest against Wikipedia's map of India

Hello, Zuggernaut, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BJP youth wing protest against Wikipedia's map of India whether the article BJP youth wing protest against Wikipedia's map of India should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving BJP youth wing protest against Wikipedia's map of India, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! regentspark (comment) 13:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!


Stubs		Cleanup
	Ahirwar		Parvez Butt
	Engineer-in-Chief (Pakistan Army)		Brazil
	PAF Base Minhas		Nellore
	Malvi language	Merge
	Shaheen-III		Occupy Wall Street
	Dvija		Ra'ad
	Saam TV		Tamil Kshatriya
	PAF Base Masroor	Add sources
	ECAN F17		Sheila Dikshit
	Abdul Ali Malik		Siachen conflict
	Anton Sutterlüty		Khan Research Laboratories
	Aeronautical Society of India	Wikify
	Rational fideism		Operation Grand Slam
	R.530		Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, Pakistan
	Ballal		Energy policy of India
	PAF Base Peshawar	Expand
	PAF Base Chaklala		Zulfiqar Ali Khan
	Seer Karuneegar		Indo-Pakistani relations
	Pedireddla		Pakistani missile research and development program

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your prolific and impressive work pertaining to India related articles. Cheers, buddy! :-) Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 09:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joyson, Thanks for what is most likely the last barnstar. I saw your e-mail late, yes, I've decided to leave the Wikipedia community of editors. There is a small community working on the various Indian Wikipedias in local languages whom I admire and respect and I wish them the very best. If you are fluent in a regional language, you might consider contributing there too. Thanks again, Joyson, for all the collaboration and support. Zuggernaut (talk) 09:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's really sad that you have left. I was really looking forward to more of your awesome contributions. But i guess you have other more interesting things to do, and i wish you all the best. Take care! Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 10:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

I've decided to leave the Wikipedia community of editors. I am sorry I am not available by e-mail anymore and have left unanswered e-mails. Thank you and best wishes to the entire Wikipedia community including the people I've had content disputes with. Goodbye. Zuggernaut (talk) 09:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WIKI-MOKSHA

This user has attained Moksha from Wikipedia.

Copy edit request at the GOCE

Hello, Zuggernaut. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Kunbi at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Braincricket (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revival of COTM

Hi,

You may be aware that Collaboration of the Month has been revived by members of WP: India. For January 2012 there are 2 articles - Indian COTM - Premchand and Indian COTM for GA - Mahatma Gandhi. As a senior and respected editor you are requested to partake in this activity. Cheers, Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 15:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2012 Contest

Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.

As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.

If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.

You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.

ssriram_mt (talk) & AshLin (talk) (Drive coordinators)

Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:47, 12 March 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite

Hello Zuggernaut. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang ^{DR goes to Wikimania!} 02:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Wikipedia is missing good editors like you. hoping to get you back into editing on Indian wiki articles. regards

ÐℬigXЯaɣ 06:54, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He has attained Nirvana from Wikipedia.इति इतिUAनेति नेति Humour Thisthat2011 16:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Authors of the Upanishads

Category:Authors of the Upanishads, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 13:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Religion in India

Template:Religion in India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Famines in India

Template:Famines in India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GAR - Deshastha Brahmin

Deshastha Brahmin, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sitush (talk) 07:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of festivals of Maharashtrian Brahmins for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of festivals of Maharashtrian Brahmins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of festivals of Maharashtrian Brahmins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 21:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Population of castes in Maharashtra in 1931

Template:Population of castes in Maharashtra in 1931 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Famines in The Republic of India

Template:Famines in The Republic of India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Famines in pre-colonial India

Template:Famines in pre-colonial India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Historical GDPs of India, UK and USA

Template:Historical GDPs of India, UK and USA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali

Template:Yoga Sutras of Patanjali has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Khandoba

Khandoba has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]