Jump to content

User talk:Z75SG61Ilunqpdb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Z75SG61Ilunqpdb

[edit]

Z75SG61IlunqpdbZ75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Claria Corporation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —C.Fred (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20061004072144/http://gator.com:80/</ref>
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 20:07, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wtwilson3. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Garry Shandling, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Blogs are not reliable sources. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 05:17, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undid revision 837010372 by @Wtwilson3: : Undoing blind revert that assumed citation was a specious "blog" without examining the website. The "blog" is an online listing of a podcast by Marc Maron of WTF with Marc Maron audio recording of interview with Sharon Stone
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 19:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the article suggestion: Eliza Ann Pittsinger

[edit]

Thank you for your suggestion of having someone work on Eliza A. Pittsinger -- sounds like a good project =)

-Kenirwin/(talk) 12:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nan Grey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page She Loves Me Not (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures and indentation

[edit]

On talk pages and other pages where we sign our comments, the convention is that we don't indent the signature relative to the rest of the comment.

The reason for this is that we show which comment we're replying to by indenting our reply with one more colon than that comment. Additional indentation of the signature makes it harder to see where one comment ends and the next one begins, and makes it harder for later participants in the discussion to know how much to indent their comments.

So, we either place the signature at the end of the last line of the comment, like this. --Pipetricker (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or alternatively, we place the signature on a separate line after the comment (with no empty line in-between), with the same indentation as the rest of the comment. In particular, this is used if there's an item of not-running-text such as a bullet point at the end of the comment, in order not to attach the signature to that item.
  • Like after this bullet point
--Pipetricker (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dodge College of Film and Media Arts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 01:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Samf4u: : Please read before deleting,
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Don%27t_be_dense
Dodge College of Film and Media Arts is an article written like an advertisement, and seems pasted from chapman.edu
next time start a new section.
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Z75SG61Ilunqpdb, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Georgina Spelvin have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: do a diff or meld of both, they are not identical, the information was paraphrased, so this should not have been reversed. You deleted history from Wikipedia, which seems suspect.

~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: do a diff or meld of both, they are not identical, the information was paraphrased, so this should not have been reversed. You deleted history from Wikipedia, which seems suspect.

~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need to recover references deleted by User:Diannaa, User:Diannaa deleted contents of the revisions in the history of Georgina Spelvin from Wikipedia. From what I see, all the facts on http://www.glaws.org/cgi-bin/pmpre3/cgi/pm.cgi?action=display&login=georgina are still in the article but subsequent citations were deleted. Since I did not offline backup the work I did, I can't prove that her claims are not factual. I want to get a copy of Georgina Spelvin, as edited by Z75SG61Ilunqpdb at 07:27, 28 April 2018
~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RevisionDelete was introduced for administrators in 2010. The community's endorsement of the tool included a very strong consensus that its potential to be abused should be strictly barred, prevented by the community, and written into the policy. Especially, RevisionDelete does not exist to remove "ordinary" offensive comments and incivility, or unwise choices of wording between users, nor to redact block log entries. Material must be grossly offensive, with little likelihood of significant dissent about its removal. Otherwise it should not be removed. Administrators should consult as usual if uncertain that a revision would be appropriate to redact.

~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright violation and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view the overlap. Additional copyright violations were detected by manually comparing the source document with your addition. Regardless of the copyright issue, this page cannot be considered a reliable independent source of information, as it is a biography written by the subject herself, not an independent source. Please review Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources for information on how to identify reliable sources. This is particularly important for biographies of living people. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need to to get a copy of Georgina Spelvin, as edited by Z75SG61Ilunqpdb at 07:27, 28 April 2018 perhaps at User:Z75SG61Ilunqpdb/Georgina Spelvin and I will delete it immediately.

~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

is an identical copy and paste from :
http://www.glaws.org/cgi-bin/pmpre3/cgi/pm.cgi?action=display&login=georgina
redirects to:
does not have that content from :
http://www.glaws.org/cgi-bin/pmpre3/cgi/pm.cgi?action=display&login=georgina
if this was a copy and paste from :
http://www.glaws.org/cgi-bin/pmpre3/cgi/pm.cgi?action=display&login=georgina
that page would have been flagged, two of the pages are same page with different referers and they all redirect, the copypatrol crawler seems fooled by a clever set of websites.
~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 16:24, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The CopyPatrol bot is a bot, and its findings should not be taken too literally. I am not a bot, but a Wikipedia administrator who has assessed literally tens of thousands of potential copyright violations. You copied material from this page, such as the wording "just about every small town in Texas" and " the assumption of that role for the last months of the show's run". I can send you a copy of the deleted material via email, but you will have to activate your Wikipedia email first. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Diannaa's assessment; she did not remove much (about five sentences) but they were all copied from the sources mentioned (primarily glaws). Primefac (talk) 17:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Confirm email address
@Diannaa: : email address has now been confirmed.
~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 17:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Email sent. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:35, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"As a child, Spelvin fell victim to an attack of polio, but she recovered enough of her mobility to become a dancer." not on http://www.glaws.org/cgi-bin/pmpre3/cgi/pm.cgi?action=display&login=georgina
~~ Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 18:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I removed it because it was unsourced. Please feel free to add it back in if you have a source for it. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:07, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Michael Cohen (lawyer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please use secondary sources, WP:SECONDARY. Also, the repeat ref format is described in WP:REF. Zefr (talk) 03:59, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Cohen (lawyer). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't add Dropbox sources to the article; please don't edit war on overcitation, WP:CITEKILL Zefr (talk) 04:07, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zefr: : Michael Avenatti tweeted dropbox document which was quoted in WashPost NYTimes and Bloomberg. News sites summarized document, and also published dropbox link.
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 04:12, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Zefr: : there is more to add on the subject, I added the citations first
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Use the secondary publication rather than the dropbox. Also, you need only one comprehensive ref to cover these points, rather than multiple cites. --Zefr (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Zefr: : that tweeted dropbox document is the subject of a federal investigation, so a direct link is important.
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 04:34, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No one would disagree that it's interesting and likely important, but it's more news and recentism, WP:RECENTISM, than it is encyclopedic. That is the purpose of WP:SECONDARY news sources to break it down, and makes us as editors keep a perspective on WP:V. --Zefr (talk) 13:36, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alvin Duskin

[edit]

Hello Z75SG61Ilunqpdb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alvin Duskin for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium (talk) 13:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


@Natureium: "encyclopedic content" is vague...
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
When adding information, please try to WP:CITE a source for each statement whenever possible!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Z75SG61Ilunqpdb! Thank you for your contributions. I am QuackGuru and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

For the new page please try to provide one citation per claim rather than many citations per claim. More information can be found here. I commented out the citations because there were too many. All you have to do is add a citation for each [citation needed] tag. QuackGuru (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hughes

[edit]

Hi User:Z75SG61Ilunqpdb. Re: your reversion in this edit, you're suggesting that a company owned by Howard Hughes which was in the Southern California aerospace industry and employing a "machinist", could be anything other than Hughes Aircraft Company? I think the current version suggests he went to work for Hughes personally. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Martinevans123: Dick Dale's quote only says Howard Hughes. searching finds:
I had not yet found a reference which would affirm Hughes Aircraft Company
please update with references
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well. I'm prepared to leave it as misleading, if not entirely wrong. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinevans123: Hughes Aircraft Company is correct
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now you've really confused me. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Martinevans123:
File:Don Knotts Barney and the bullet Andy Griffith Show.jpg wikt:affirm WP:CS
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Bateman

[edit]

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: :
  • Bateman, Justine; Bateman, Jason; Gordon, Sol; Danson, Ted; Gordon, Sol; Paramount Home Video (Firm); Paramount Pictures Corporation (May 31, 1989). "How can I tell if I'm really in love?". Paramount Video. Retrieved May 31, 2018 – via Open WorldCat.
  • "How Can I Tell If I'm Really in Love? - Classroom Version". rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
  • "How Can I Tell If I'm Really in Love? (1986) - Rick Hauser - Cast and Crew - AllMovie". AllMovie. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
  • "Video attempts to answer teen-agers' questions about love and intimacy". February 12, 1987. Retrieved May 31, 2018 – via Christian Science Monitor.
  • "Jason Bateman". advocate.com. December 3, 2007. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 15:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gargoyle Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gargoyle Club, 69 Dean Street, Soho, London, circa 1940.jpg

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

[edit]

Hello Z75SG61Ilunqpdb. (That's quite a name?) I ask you to take a look at your oppose in the current RfA, and consider deleting or striking through the term "character flaw". That is making it personal, and there is no need for this statement. Your oppose stands on its own without this characterization of another editor.

Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Miss California. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. While these were in the guise of references, it amounts to little more than a link dump. ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  02:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@CJinoz: there was a request for an article for Donna Cherry, but it fails notoriety, thus a redirect to Miss California#Winners and a couple of references. some links were left commented out, to save the next contributor some trouble, as she id quite obscure. Why don't you put it on the Talk page ?Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 03:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Except most of those links are junk and dumping a whole lot of links simply because an article is not warranted is not how we do things ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  07:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Consider this, a link that one would not use for a citation, (iMdb) often has information, that one can verify elsewhere, which one could then use for a citation. <!-- ʬ --¡> Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 07:53, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Generally it should only be used as a source for hard data on films. At present you are using it to reference nothing. And whatever you were intending to reference it for, there is likely to be a better reliable source as an alternative. ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  09:02, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing username

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Z75SG61Ilunqpdb", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because confusing usernames are highly discouraged. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  03:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glyph symmetry Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Belated welcome

[edit]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Z75SG61Ilunqpdb. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  07:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

  • I see a welcome got overlooked, so here is a belated one. I strongly suggest you read the links here, they will help you figure out how to contribute usefully. And whilst I understand your love of glyph symmetry, that username is indeed confusing & not so easy for others to use or remember ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  07:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
<small>'''... [[User:CJinoz|<span style="background-color:black; color:white;">  CJ <nowiki>[a Kiwi] in  ]][[User talk:CJinoz|<span style="background-color:black; color:gold;">Oz ]]</span></nowiki> is indeed confusing....Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 08:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is a difference between usernames and signatures. I suggest you familiarise yourself more with Wikipedia and stop being disruptive. ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  08:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A lower-case el and an upper-case i ? Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) CJinOz, your username looks pretty plain to me. But if Z7 gave his signature the same treatment you've given yours, I think we might be in real trouble. If Z7 wants to look like a machine, that's fine. "Robots are people too, you know." Martinevans123 (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
hiding User_talk:CJinoz ? Z75SG61Ilunqpdb (talk) 20:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me? ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  20:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, I no longer wish to discuss this with you. It was just a friendly suggestion in case you weren’t aware of the policy. Up to you as to what you want to do about it. ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  21:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The specific section is [1] ...   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  00:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AlterNet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm ♠ 20:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Z75SG61Ilunqpdb&oldid=850219058"