User talk:Vinayak kohli

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. El_C 03:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. El_C 03:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vinayak kohli, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vinayak kohli! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Aerospace Laboratories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HAL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Please someone helpme. Someone has blocked me I don't know why

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Vinayak kohli (talk) 06:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked from editing because you have been abusing multiple accounts. If you wish to appeal the block, instructions can be found at the guide to appeals, but you should make any such appeal from your original account. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:46, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinayak kohli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because my friend used his Wikipedia account on my advice. I was not fully aware of the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia because. I was new on Wikipedia. Now I have read and understand all the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia. I assure you that this will never happen in future and I want to contribute usefully to Wikipedia and try to make it more better.so I request to please unblock me.@Bbb23:(Vinayak kohli (talk) 09:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry and/or checkuser block. Check users have access to technical and personally identifying information they may not disclose openly on Wikipedia. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB. If this is not your original account, you will need to appeal at your original account. Also, your explanation falls far short of explaining the events leading to your block.-- Deep fried okra 16:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help me

Someone has blocked.i try to contact him but he is replying. What should I do please help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

(Vinayak kohli (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

While you are blocked, you should only be using this page to request unblock. Please read Appealing a block for instructions, and the Guide to unblock appeals to learn how to craft an acceptable request. As your block is a Checkuser block, meaning there is technical data to support it, it can only be reveiwed by a Checkuser. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have not made a formal unblock request. Please review the pages I have indicated to learn how. 331dot (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinayak kohli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because my friend used his Wikipedia account on my mobile. This is violation of policy of Wikipedia. This will mislead other editors, disrupt discussions,distort consensus, avoid sanctions,evade blocks, violate community standard.As a new editor I was not aware of these policy you should atleast noticed me before blocking me as I got edit war notice. Now I have read the policy and guidelines of Wikipedia. And I assure you that this will never happen again in future. I want to contribute usefully to Wikipedia so unblock me @Deepfriedokra:(Vinayak kohli (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

This appeal has zero credibility - you've explained two accounts, but we know of three. MER-C 19:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.