User talk:Talkicolor

Welcome!

Hello, Talkicolor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! I am One of Many (talk) 08:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of lost films

Please don't add films unless you have a WP:reliable source to back them up. I'm not finding much except Arne Andersen's list, and I don't think that qualifies as a solid reference. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb trivia is not considered a reliable source - very, very far from it. See WP:USERGENERATED. All those references have to go. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cannot itself be used as a reference either. In one case, I've added the book reference from the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TCM's trivia is no better a source than IMDb's, especially when it's worded exactly the same. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:34, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silentera's information is also no better a source than TCM. As you can see from the following page http://www.silentera.com/info/contributors.html the contributors to silentera are musicians and silent movie fans. They have no credentials to speak with authority on silent films. The highest degree these people hold are a Bachelor's Degree which hardly qualifies them as an authority. If you check the source they quote, none of them, except for imdb, state that a film is believed to be lost. They are general references to common facts about the films such as cast, director, plot, etc. At least TCM owns the right and copyright to most of these lost films so the fact they considered a film to be lost is hardly trivial. They have considerable interest in finding these films, so if they have any information about a film being discovered they will reveal it if for nothing more than to make a profit. According to TCM any user contributions will be distinctly marked so: http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/contribute/?id=5770&src=title&date=1929&name=The-Argyle-Case "You will receive online recognition for any posted contribution based on the personal info you submit." In the pages I referenced there was no such recognition. The material was supplied solely by TCM. Furthermore, if you look at the bottom of the pages you will note than TCM has used the following reference work in composing their movie files: "LEONARD MALTIN CLASSIC MOVIE GUIDE, COPYRIGHT 2013. USED BY ARRANGEMENT WITH PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC."Talkicolor (talk) 03:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I've stated ad nauseum, silentera is recognized by the professionals of a notable film archive as reliable. Can TCM claim the same? Your TCM suppositions are WP:OR. You need to read and understand WP:reliable sources. It's not about what we guess or surmise, it's what recognized authorities accept.

As for your other points, the list of names to which you refer is merely people that silentera wishes to thank for their featured "writings"; nowhere is it stated or even implied that they are the sole or even primary contributors. Examining the list, how is Greta de Groat (whom I have cited for a number of Pauline Frederick films) not qualified? She's the "Electronic Media Cataloger at Stanford University Libraries". The Kaufman Agency deals in film music.

Nor is having nothing more than a bachelors degree some sort of automatic disqualification. Roger Ebert, by your "reasoning", must be a fraud. That charlatan Gene Siskel only had a bachelors in (shudder) philosophy, albeit from Yale. Pauline Kael dropped out of Berkeley without a degree. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I'm going to copy this latest installment of our disagreement to the Film talk page. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silentera is a joke. Every time I use it, I find numerous errors. I don't know why I bother because you don't seem to care about any evidence but I just checked the film Careers from 1929. http://www.silentera.com/PSFL/data/C/Careers1929.html silentera calls this all-talking feature, a "silent film, with sound sequences" but check the words right before that "Billie's first talkie" so they contradict themselves. At the bottom the keywords state:"Synchronized sound film". So the people at silentera think that the film "Careers" is an all-talking picture, a part-talking picture, and a sound film with a Synchronized Score all at the same time (and yes there is a difference). Now look at the "sources" they use. One of them, a biography of Thelma Todd, they state has "Questionable accuracy" yet they are using it as a source. http://www.silentera.com/PSFL/bibliography/Edmonds-Todd.html The other is biography of thirty male stars. These hardly sound like reference material. Going back to the page for "Careers", the people at silentera don't even know if this important film is a feature (not the question marks), if it is a drama. But of course, this doesn't matter to you because the people (or should I say Gods?) at silentera can do no wrong. I have to wonder if you aren't connected to the site yourself. Please address the fact that the site is riddled with errors and questionable sources. If you are only going to reply about how silentera is "recognized by the professionals" again, then please don't bother. If these "professionals" jump off a bridge, I know I won't be following them. Talkicolor (talk) 04:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of lost films (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ann Pennington, Norman Walker, Is Everybody Happy? and Alf's Button

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

On The Border (1930 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Walter Miller, William Irving and William Rees

The Other Tomorrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kenneth Thompson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bright Lights (1930 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to James Murray, Frank Fay and Ray Perkins

Fifty Million Frenchmen (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ole Olsen, Pre-code and John Halliday

Gold Dust Gertie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ole Olsen, Herbert Taylor and Pre-code

Captain Applejack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pre-code and John Halliday

Illicit (1931 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to William Holmes and Charles Butterworth

One Night at Susie's (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Loder and John Francis Dillon

The Argyle Case (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to James Quinn and Thomas Pratt

The Widow from Chicago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Neil Hamilton and Harold Goodwin

Viennese Nights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pre-code and Ullrich Haupt

Adoration (1928 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Rawlins

Bought! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Richard Bennett

Captain Thunder (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

God's Gift to Women (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Mothers Cry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pat O'Malley

Night Nurse (1931 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Other Men's Women (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Scarlet Pages (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Halliday

Side Show (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Sit Tight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Smart Money (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Song of the Flame (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Svengali (1931 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

The Aviator (1929 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

The Bargain (1931 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles Butterworth

The Barker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

The Mad Genius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

The Millionaire (1931 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

The Star Witness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Careers (film), Talkicolor!

Wikipedia editor DGG just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs some additional refs, preferebly to reviews . And the ploy summary must show the conclusion: who is it who is guilty?

To reply, leave a comment on DGG's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Orphaned non-free media (File:Smart Money 1931 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Smart Money 1931 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Beware Of Bachelors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Joseph Jackson and Dave Morris

Broadway Babies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pre-code

Careers (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Francis Dillon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of incomplete or partially lost films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wolf of Wall Street (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:58, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Son of the Gods 1930 Lobby Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Son of the Gods 1930 Lobby Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Second Choice 1930 Sheet Music.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Second Choice 1930 Sheet Music.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Barker 1928 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Barker 1928 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Outward Bound 1930 Title Card.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Outward Bound 1930 Title Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beware of Bachelors 1928 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beware of Bachelors 1928 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]