User talk:TFGM

Welcome!

Hello, TFGM, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Fritz Mindermann, from its old location at User:TFGM/sandbox/Fritz Mindermann. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 15:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Mindermann (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bythebooklibrary was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft needs some more sources for references. Please try to put the few sources in place in the draft into inline citations. A good tutorial for help on this is located at WP:REFB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bythebooklibrary (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TFGM, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bythebooklibrary (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Mindermann (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References are WP:PRIMARY.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acta Neurochirurgica (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Acta Neurochirurgica and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Acta Neurochirurgica, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 10:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Acta Neurochirurgica

Per WP:NOTJOURNAL, scientific journals are not encourage to be published on Wikipedia. However, you can submit your article on our sister projects, such as Wikibooks, Wikisource, and Wikiversity. They welcome inclusion of scientific journals there and would very much thank you for your contribution. EROS ^message 11:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. I am afraid that there is a misunderstanding. I am neither trying to publish a paper nor scientific content but I am merely trying to publish information on a periodical which itself publishes scientific papers. Therefore, the argument that "Wikipedia is not a scientific journal" does not apply. The general public has an interest in what kind of periodicals on neurosurgery are around. With my article, the reader will be able to make up his or her mind if the journal is trustworthy and if they want to consult it. The entries on "Neurosurgery" and "Journal of Neurosurgery" serve the same purpose. Please reconsider. Thank you, TFGM

Your submission at Articles for creation: F. Mindermann (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Fritz Mindermann, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You've an identical Afc running. No point in both.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F. Mindermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F. Mindermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 19:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Mindermann (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NottNott was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only reference added since the last AfC decline is also a WP:PRIMARY source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Nott Nott 22:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fritz Mindermann (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jake Brockman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still undersourced / primarily sourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fritz Mindermann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]==References==

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
Then click on "templates",
Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:45, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Google". google-wikipedia. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Google". google custom search. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Wiley". Wiley Online Library. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Patents". google patents. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Books". google books. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Scholar". google scholar. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
^ Mindermann, Fritz. "Science History Institute". Othmer Library of Chemical History. The Science History Institute. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[1] Mindermann, Fritz. "Google". google-wikipedia. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[2] Mindermann, Fritz. "Google". google custom search. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[3] Mindermann, Fritz. "Wiley". Wiley Online Library. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[4] Mindermann, Fritz. "Patents". google patents. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[5] Mindermann, Fritz. "Books". google books. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[6] Mindermann, Fritz. "Scholar". google scholar. google. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[7] Mindermann, Fritz. "Science History Institute". Othmer Library of Chemical History. The Science History Institute. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]