Jump to content

User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archives/2010/July

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hi SpacemanSpiff, I recently reverted the edits on Economy of India which says "ref is for 2009, where did 2010 come in?", As the reference may be for 2009 but it does shows the data for 2010 or may be they (IMF) just have updated the same page rather creating new for 2010. If you scroll to extreme right you can see, they have added one column for 2010 too. If you feel that i did wrong please revert my edits. thanks KuwarOnline Talk 08:28, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I saw that you reverted the edits, please open the IMF 2010 data, my point is if you say its estimate, then even 2009 data is estimate if you see table heading at extreme right it say "Shaded cells indicate IMF staff estimates" both for 2009 and 2010. So if you say 2009 data is correct then its wrong isnt it? KuwarOnline Talk 09:02, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
2009 is available now, so it should be used. Random forecasts for future years should not be used. However, if the 2009 forecast is used instead of the actuals, then that needs to be rectified. —SpacemanSpiff 14:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Relation of Language Categories on India to Tamil in Reunion

Hey Spaceman Spiff,

You mentioned here [1] that you think that discussion links to this discussion. I am still unsure of what relation you thought these discussions might have. I am curious as to what that would be. In any case, I'm not sure if you have seen the original discussion on the topic, at the talk page and edit summaries at Malbars. Munci (talk) 22:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

Relation of Language Categories on India to Tamil in Reunion

Hey Spaceman Spiff,

(I re-added this after Miszabot removed it because I don't think you would've seen it while you weren't using wikipedia for the while.)You mentioned here [2] that you think that discussion links to this discussion. I am still unsure of what relation you thought these discussions might have. I am curious as to what that would be. In any case, I'm not sure if you have seen the original discussion on the topic, at the talk page and edit summaries at Malbars. Munci (talk) 22:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

Relation of Language Categories on India to Tamil in Reunion

Hey Spaceman Spiff,

(I re-added this after Miszabot removed it because I don't think you would've seen it while you weren't using wikipedia for the while.)You mentioned here [3] that you think that discussion links to this discussion. I am still unsure of what relation you thought these discussions might have. I am curious as to what that would be. In any case, I'm not sure if you have seen the original discussion on the topic, at the talk page and edit summaries at Malbars. Munci (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

Hey i just read the article Mahabharata, There in sub category Modern interpretations there mentioned about the movie Karnan Starring Shivaji Ganesan and N.T Ramarao which was an epic classic in south.As it is semi protected i want you to help editing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnu308 (talkcontribs) 04:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey i just read the article Mahabharata, There in sub category Modern interpretations there mentioned about the movie Karnan Starring Shivaji Ganesan and N.T Ramarao which was an epic classic in south.As it is semi protected i want you to help editing it. sunnu308 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnu308 (talkcontribs) 04:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

hi! here is one user Ajayd who is making nonconstructive changes to BIMARU even after being warned several times. Please have a look on this matter. Thanks --Onef9day Talk! 21:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

TZP is being developed

Hi there, If you have time, Taare Zameen Par is being developed for a future FAC. Take a look if you can. -Classicfilms (talk) 18:03, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I just got back on after a few weeks of inactivity, likely to be inactive for a little bit more, will take a look in a week or so. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 05:38, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Sounds great, thank you. -Classicfilms (talk) 13:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)