User talk:Sisyph

Welcome!

Hello, Sisyph, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with bot

I hope you appreciate the irony: [1]. Every page in Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed will no doubt be the same. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 16:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interlanguage links

These articles have quite out-of-order interlanguage links. Maybe, you could walk through all of them and correct it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctilucales

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctiluca

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noctiluca

etc.

Help with writing a bot code

Hello. I've seen you created a bot that interwikies articles in English Wikipedia and another Wikipedia language. I wanted to create a similar bot that will insert transwikis between English and Tagalog Wikipedia. Mind if I ask you how to do it? Thanks.--JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 12:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

interwiki

Hello Sisyph, thank you for the message. "Je ne parle pas beaucoup de francais", as they say, mais une quantite suffisante pour (a?) ajouter les (des?) liens interwikis.

I noticed you are running a bot, and that it recently added a bunch of links to es: that I added to en: (ici). I have wanted to ask an interwiki bot owner if there is an option to "follow my edits" so that a bot adds them to the other wikipedias. There is no use adding the links manually to more than one wikipedia when a bot can, in principle, do the rest. The category links seem especially unlikely, or slow, to be picked up by bots. Le temps perdu (talk) 05:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is excellent: [2]. It makes a big difference to whether I consider my linking worthwhile, knowing that it is propagating to other wikis. Thanks. Le temps perdu (talk) 06:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sisyph, could you point your bot at my recent interwiki additions once again? Thanks, Le temps perdu (talk) 08:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I noticed you or your bot redirected categorization of an article I initiated. It moved Lloyd (Bud) Winter from "Category:Track and field athletics coaches" to "Category:American track and field coaches" which was, I guess, appropriate since the previous category only has other categories now (someone has altered it, perhaps your bot). The problem is, now in its new category, Winter is now not listed alphabetically by his last name W, but by his first L. Since this is an automatically generated page, there is no way to correct it. It appears to be the only such case on the page, but should be corrected by someone with that power, perhaps by you since you caused the change to that category in the first place. Trackinfo (talk) 02:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Slime molds

What makes you think that a single species of Slime Mold (Fuligo) is equivalent with an article about the group Slime Molds la:Gymnomycota? That is a mistake. Please correct it. I am quite sure that if I will correct it manually, your bot will come along and recreate the mistake (I have seen enough of that). Thanks for your attention. Taka (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summer olympics venues

Hi Sisyph

If you think that a category is incorrectly named, please do not just create a new category and move all the articles to it. There is a process for renaming categories, at WP:CFD, whereby editors can discuss the proposed change and try to reach a consensus.

It appears that you emptied several categories relating to Summer olympics venues, and then blanked the category pages. I have opened a CFD discussion with the proposal that all changes should be reverted as an out-of-process move: see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 3#Summer_olympics_venues. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

20-20 Vision - un défi du Pays de Galles

Un grand merci pour l'ajout d'informations sur le Challange! Cependant, nous ne pouvons cocher si l'information a été ajoutée à partir d'aujourd'hui. Je suis vraiment désolé que ce n'était pas clair. J'ai maintenant ajouté une phrase ci-dessus la table. Texte minimum nécessaire: 2000 octets de texte. Merci - et, encore une fois - je m'excuse de ne pas faire clairement. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awww! How so kind! Many thanks! my heart sings like a linnet when people say nice things! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot on English Wikipedia

A proposal to de-authorize a group of idle interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia is currently in process. A bot account of yours has been included in the list. If you are no longer using this bot, no action is neccessary by you. Should you wish to revive your bot in the near future, please remove your bot from the list here: en:Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bot_that_are_inactive_for_the_last_2-4_years_and_may_lose_bot_flag. Thank you for your contributions. For the en: Bot Approvals Group, en:user:Xaosflux 12:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sisyph. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sisyph. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sisyph. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]