User talk:Satipo

Speedy deletion of Monster Blood For Beakfast

A tag has been placed on Monster Blood For Beakfast, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 01:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monster Blood For Beakfast

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Monster Blood For Beakfast, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TN‑X-Man 01:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Satipo! I am Legotech and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! LegoTech·(t)·(c) 01:25, 26 May 2008 (UTC[) {{helpme}} Don't delete Monster Blood for Breakfast!Satipo (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)SatipoSatipo (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC) I'm sorry, we can't help you with this sort of thing.If you want to protest this block, then go to the Amin noticeboard . Mr. Green^{Hit Me Up}Userboxes 16:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Please don't move other peoples' user pages to new titles. It is considered very disruptive. Hut 8.5 15:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for adminship

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship covers the process to become an admin. One admin can not make someone else an admin. It will take time and I suggest you read some of the active nominations being considered so you can better understand the process. Given your current track record and warnings, it will be quite a while and many edits and assistance to other users and to the operation of the encyclopedia before your request would have any kind of a chance. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what's the date?

I don't know what's the Date and Time in Shawnee,OK Satipo (talk) 02:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Satipo[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indiana Jones and the Temple of the Crystal Skull

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Indiana Jones and the Temple of the Crystal Skull, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 15:02, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Temple of the Crystal Skull

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Temple of the Crystal Skull, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Indiana Jones and the Temple of the Crystal Skull

RfD nomination of Temple of the Crystal Skull

List of characters in the Indiana Jones series

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Alientraveller (talk) 17:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Alientraveller (talk) 18:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Satipo, I don't mind that you insulted me. I just want to know why you feel a separate article should exist. Alientraveller (talk) 18:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Narrow gauge engines (Thomas and Friends), you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 01:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Gwernol 01:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satipo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry

Decline reason:

Inadequate request; see WP:GAB. — Sandstein 22:25, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Colonel Dietrich has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sceptre ^(talk) 14:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Gobler constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Sceptre ^(talk) 14:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lego Harry Potter: the Video Game. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- JediLofty ^User_Talk 09:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Lego Harry Potter: the Video Game, you will be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of Star Wars podracers

A tag has been placed on List of Star Wars podracers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --EEMIV (talk) 22:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Rotta The Huttlett' listed for deletion

A page that you have been involved in editing, Rotta The Huttlett, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thank you. StaticGull Talk 13:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ratts Tyerell

A tag has been placed on Ratts Tyerell, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JNW (talk) 21:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Boonta Eve Classic. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Individual podracers and the Boonta Eve Classic fail to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. Please stop undoing the redirects and take a few moments to read WP:GNG and WP:WAF. --EEMIV (talk) 22:31, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although I'm plenty glad to see this user blocked, my use of the term "spamming non-notable Star Wars" articles didn't mean he was adding external links, but rather firing up multiple one- or two-sentence stubs about wholly insignificant Star Wars and Indiana Jones characters. --EEMIV (talk) 15:02, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EEMIV, I've modified the block template to a more generic version. PhilKnight (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Satipo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'll stop.I promise!

Decline reason:

the statements you made below do not engender much trust in the sincerity of your pledge to stop. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 18:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hey stupid guys,Unblock me or i'll block you back and then kill you! Satipo (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC)SatipoSatipo (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2008 (UTC) I'm an idiot....--Satipo (talk) 02:16, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]