User talk:Revparker

Possible citation spam

Please review the Wikipedia guideline on citation spamming, or "adding references with the aim of promoting the author or the work being referenced":

Citation spamming is the illegitimate or improper use of citations, footnotes or references. Citation spamming is a form of search engine optimization or promotion that typically involves the repeated insertion of a particular citation or reference in multiple articles by a single contributor. Often these are added not to verify article content but rather to populate numerous articles with a particular citation. Variations of citation spamming include academics and scientists using their editing privileges primarily to add citations to their own work...
— WP:CITESPAM

I try to assume good faith of other editors on Wikipedia, but I don't see how your recent citation of a preprint article titled "Role strain among South African seminarians in the Anglican Church: toward a typology of congregational support" (a primary source which has not even been cited by any other articles on Google Scholar) to multiple articles (namely: Academic achievement‎, Dropping out‎, Goal setting‎, Religion and coping with trauma‎, Self-determination theory‎) could be anything but citation spamming as described in the Wikipedia guideline quoted above, given that your Wikipedia username matches the name of the author of the cited preprint article, and most of your activity on Wikipedia has been adding this citation to the aforementioned articles. Biogeographist (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Episcopal Catholic Church

Hello Revparker,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Episcopal Catholic Church for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraham David Parker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abraham David Parker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Azkord (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham David Parker moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Abraham David Parker, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI editing of Abraham David Parker

Hello, Revparker. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Biogeographist (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Episcopal Catholic Church moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Episcopal Catholic Church, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Episcopal Catholic Church (December 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Catrìona was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: All of these are non independent sources. A quick google is not finding any independent sources, so the topic is probably non-notable unless offline, independent sources exist.

Catrìona (talk) 02:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Revparker! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catrìona (talk) 02:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Revparker. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Episcopal Catholic Church, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Revparker! You created a thread called This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Abraham David Parker

Hello, Revparker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Abraham David Parker.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:22, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Episcopal Catholic Church

Hello, Revparker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Episcopal Catholic Church".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]