User talk:Pyrolord777

Welcome!

Hello, Pyrolord777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! BOVINEBOY 2008 :) 17:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Conquer Online, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Conquer Online. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Conquer Online. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You the one who can't seem to accept the truth much less check the cites I already added. Pyrolord777 (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message boards are not reliable sources; for the interviews, they do not state what you are claiming. You are synthesizing your own opinion from statements. That is original research, and not appropriate for Wikipedia articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The forum link tells exactly how everyone felt about that whether its considered "reliable" or not. And FYI

(3rd page) Karena: Ever got to the point where you got addicted to Conquer? Henry: Sure, anyone that plays gets addicted. Karena: Hehe, why? Henry: I have a lot of things to do to keep busy all the time.

This is a lie all there is to do is pk, train, do small quests, and spend money to improve your char unless you consider chatting with friends but that can be done anywhere.

Something else(4th page) Karena: Do you plan some other work with CO in the future? Henry: Well yes, I plan to bulk up my other characters. LOL! Karena: Where do you stand in the whole Bulkers vs Non-Bulkers debate? Henry: It doesn't matter to me if you bulk or not. Everyone should enjoy the game how ever they chose to play it. Some people just can’t afford to pay for it, so there are a lot of things in the game that doesn’t cost. Karena: I can’t agree more! The way they have the game made there is no enjoying it if your not a bulker. To even stand a chance in pvp you have to be a bulker as well. Theres a massive bulker on my server volcano that goes by V3NOM who has full +12's it takes half of the bulkers in my guild(I don't own the guild its a figure of speech) just to kill him. Pyrolord777 (talk) 20:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kidnapping of Jaycee Lee Dugard

Regarding your comment at Jaycee Dugard, please remember to focus article talk page comments on article content. See WP:NOTAFORUM. --Born2cycle (talk) 18:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, original research? Snob? What are you talking about? I was the one who restored (undeleted) your comment, three times! 1, 2, 3. I've also spent the better part of the day arguing how inappropriate the explanations were associated with the multiple deletes of your comment. How about a thank you? --Born2cycle (talk) 06:57, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 10:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]