User talk:Pudmaker

오른쪽 박스에 관하여

오른쪽 박스 어떻게 만드는 건가요? 일일이 쳐서 만든건가요 아니면 저런 박스를 만들어 주는것인지? 언어 박스가 존재하는 걸로 봐서 다른 것도 있을것 같은데 알려주셨으면 합니다.

처음 여기 왔을때 많은 외국의 이용자들이 자신의 정체성과 이력 등을 소개 등을 위해 만들어놓은 박스('정곶감'따윈 즐.)들을 보고 '저걸 어떻게 다 만들까'하는 호기심에 하루 이틀 쌓아나가기 시작한게 어느덧 저정도가 되었습니다. 제것도 아직 '고수'들에 비해서는 많이 부족하지만, 비결은 매우 평범합니다. 자주, 수시로 이곳에 들려서 많은 국내외 이용자들이 싸이월드 미니홈피 꾸며놓듯 아기자기 꾸며놓은 박스들을 보고 1. 직접 만들거나 2. (이미 만들어진 대중적 박스의 경우)붙여넣는 방식으로 박스들을 쌓습니다. 언어박스의 경우, 만드는 형식이 매우 정형화되어있습니다. 일단 저나 선생님이나 우리말(한국어)이 모국어니까 당근 'User ko'를 괄호(바로 옆줄모습 참조) 안에 붙이시고, 그다음...영어는 {{ }} 괄호 안에 en-1 en-2... ...en-5(미국영어는 en-us, 영국영어는 en-gb, 호주영어는 en-au 등 분파별로 다양함), 독일어는 de-1 de-2... ...de-5등의 언어기호가 있습니다. 숫자는 단계(초보자는 1, 2, 중급자는 3, 4, 고급자는 5)를 뜻합니다. 선생님께서 잘 구사하시는 언어들의 기호를 넣고 박스를 만드세요. 다른건 그때그때 눈여겨보시다가 '이거다' 싶은걸 직접 넣으시고요. 시작이 반입니다. 부디 더 멋진 방을 만드세요. 아울러 여기에서 울 한반도와 전세계의 정보민주화에도 기여해주시고요. 존경하는 퍼드메이커 선생님. 박스떼기와 차떼기를 혐오하는 필자 드림 Peterhansen2032 01:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Well, the debate wasn't particularly well formed. It's possible I made a mistake in deleting the article. I have asked for my decision to be reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 October 5#Digitally Imported. I believe that it will most likely be undeleted. - Ta bu shi da yu 04:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I checked it overturned. It is definitely the number 1 dance music station in the world. I hope you not to make such mistakes like this.

Talk: Korea University

Hi Pudmaker! I reverted your blanking of part of the talk page. I am sorry because I really understand the reasoning that you were using. You are right in principle!!! Talk pages for articles are for discussing article changes, as you said. Some editors were arguing about pointless stuff. We know Wikipedia is not a battleground. However, would you please write up a brief warning to the editors of Korea University so that they will understand why you blank part of the discussion? I think you were right, but please leave a warning first. That way you can avoid upsetting the editors. Cheers, dude! Grunty Thraveswain 21:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind advice. I think I lost control for myself then. I'm assure that I was right, but the way I did was not right. I will put an warning and it will make a better consequence, I hope. adidas 05:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message on the article talk page. Good job! The editors have now received one mild warning. If it continues, let's warn them again. They seem to want a neutral person so perhaps I'll post a note requesting a third party check over at the University Wikiproject. Cheers!Grunty Thraveswain 11:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mausoleum et al

I did. Like I said before, it makes no sense to use Korean as the language of it, when the inhabitants did not speak Korean as their language, nor use any Hangul, which was invited over a thousand years later. --Yuje (talk) 14:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, as for whether or not it was actually Korean, see Balhae#Characterization_and_political_interpretation as well. During naming controversies, official names take precendence. See Danzig/Gdansk, Constantinopole/Istanbul, Adrianopole/Edirne, Konigsburg/Kaliningrad, Pressburg/Bratislava, Érsekújvár/Nové Zámky, Stettin/Szczecin etc.--Yuje (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think your words don't make any sense. How about Gwanggaeto Stele? It's actually in current China territory just like the mausoleum. Koreans pronounce 廣開土 as Gwanggaeto, but I think Chinese would not. adidas (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

貞孝公主墓's official name could be Mausoleum of Princess Zhenxiao, but 貞孝公主's official name will be Jeonghyo, not Zhenxiao. How could we solve this problem? adidas (talk) 16:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to listen to your opinion in Talk:Mausoleum of Princess Zhenxiao. adidas (talk) 16:23, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All Together

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article All Together, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Marasmusine (talk) 08:09, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All Together (South Korea)

The article All Together (South Korea) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Still unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marasmusine (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pudmaker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]