User talk:Panel Guy

Prod tags

Hi, I noticed that you put prod tags on some of your user pages. Prod tags are only for articles. If you want one of your user pages deleted, you should use the speedy deletion tag U1 (see WP:Speedy#U1). Calathan (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Panel Guy! I am A8UDI and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

TomA 8 15:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mrtedsbed

hi its Mrtedsbed is this how you use the talk thing? just want to say thanks 4 ur help with What Do Kids Know? im new 2 all this

Mrtedsbed (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC)) thanks 4 the help is this right[reply]

Template nominations for deletion

Nomination for deletion of Template:British Comedy Guide (Sitcom)

Template:British Comedy Guide (Sitcom) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ckatz^chat _spy 22:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:British Comedy Guide

Template:British Comedy Guide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ckatz^chat _spy 22:17, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi Panel Guy. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you, matt br 19:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BBC programmes external link targets

Re. this. Why are you considering the Episode 1 page to be more appropriate as the EL target, rather than this, which appears to be the 'home' page for the entry. As with the above commenter, it would help if you used edit summaries. MickMacNee (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Examining the first link you provided I notice I changed Episode 1 ({{BBC programme|b00t3d45}}) to the home page ({{BBC programme|b00t3z58}}), so I actually improved the link. I will in future fill in the edit summary to avoid confusion and I apologise for not doing that first time round. --Panel Guy (talk) 17:49, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre. I think what happened is I noticed one was wrong and changed the EL link in the recent expansion, but the one that was wrong turns out to have been the infobox link. Although I thought I had double checked that diff before coming here. My mistake. MickMacNee (talk) 18:12, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

8 out of 10 cats question

Hi. I had a small observation, I wanted to call to your attention. It may be silly but I found this odd. I was checking out stuff about 8 out of 10 Cats and saw on Radiotimes that after the BB special that there would be 5 episodes, yet I checked on the SROAudience website (http://www.sroaudiences.com/that after tonight's BB taping that there would be 6 tapings (2 tapings each on 3 different days) I found that pretty odd. I know that there are certain shows that tape extra shows to televise in two parts like Family Fortunes, but I wonder why there is an extra taping. 8 out of 10 Cats does not have Christmas specials. 65.92.24.168 (talk) 17:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC) samusek2[reply]

8 out of 10 Cats do have some specials such as the Moive special (08x04) and the Sport special (09x03) which can be recorded after a different taping. --Panel Guy (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Panel Guy,

I have just noticed on The official website that this friday's episode is being billed as Episode 4 even if Radiotimes says that it is 1/5 and t hey have gotten rid of the listing on the "List page" that someone wrote for Episode 3. http://www.channel4.com/programmes/8-out-of-10-cats/episode-guide/series-10/episode-4 CWMXII has reverted the edits saying that Radiotimes is right and says that it is patently impossible. Yet the show's official website says that Friday's ep is Episode 4. I would say that the official website trumps what a television listing site says by Wikipedia's standards. Can you help settle an argument before it develops into a much bigger argument. I would appreciate your input on how we shold handle this confusion. 65.94.244.245 (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)samusek2[reply]

Redirects

Please do not make nonsense redirects everywhere like you did on nl-wiki and es-wiki. This is no longer a joke and can be seen as cross wiki vandalism. Two admins (a colleague and I) removed all on nl-wiki, please ensure the ones on es-wiki are deleted yourself or else we will inform a steward. MoiraMoira (talk) 20:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 23:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 01:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have I Got News For You

Have I Got News For You, an article which you have substantially contributed to, is up for Peer Review. You are welcome to add your comments to the review page. Rcsprinter^{Gimme a message} 20:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

HanSangYoon (talk) 19:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:They Think It's All Over

Template:They Think It's All Over has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:50, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Only Fools and Horses home video releases for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Only Fools and Horses home video releases, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Only Fools and Horses home video releases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]