User talk:Oiboy77

Jin Jing

Yeah, I will see. But I really want to avoid this seemingly controversial article. If I would care about every non-neutral article on Wikipedia I would have left a long time ago. Rather I concentrate on subjects that are not controversial and more important than the "angel in a wheelchair". Dassiebtekreuz (talk) 03:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did I remove references to the epoch times?

Show me your proof please. --Jingandteller (talk) 11:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please go to discussion page of jin jing.

--Jingandteller (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

jin jing

There is no neutrality problem now. I will remove the NPOV tag.--Jingandteller (talk) 12:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please show your reason for the POV tag in the talk page

If you can not show your reason, I will remove the POV tag.--Jingandteller (talk) 19:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing style

Could I remind you that the article on Jin Jing is not your own article and that if you decide to add category you should state a reason. And don't ignore discussions on the talk page. --Jingandteller (talk) 21:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I wrote the exact same message on User:Jingandteller's talk page a few hours ago, and now he/she spams the same message meant for him/her all over Wikipedia. Anyway, thanks for keeping an eye on the Jin Jinu article, there seems to be a whole armada of fanboys, nationalists and sockpuppets working on the article and trying to whitewash everything that is even mildly critical of "China". Novidmarana (talk) 21:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on Jin Jing. Thanks for the heads up. Yunfeng (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jin Jing, once again

Hi, could you have a look at my proposal at Talk:Jin_Jing#Proposal_to_keep_the_article_as_is and weigh in with your opinion? Thanks, Novidmarana (talk) 17:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza aid shipment

Hi Oiboy! Your recent edit of the Gaza flotilla raid page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gaza_flotilla_raid&diff=365796538&oldid=365796360

Changed wording that was meant to correlate with the title as per several HUGE discussions in the talk page. Talk:Gaza_flotilla_clash/Rename_or_move

Please revert your change from: "Gaza bound flotilla attack" to "Gaza flotilla raid"

Cheers,

Zuchinni one (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]