User talk:Nakon/arc4

Archives: 1 :: 2 :: 3

To add a new message, click HERE

Tang-ina mo!

Huwag kang makialam! letse ka. papayin kita!!!! hwag mong binabago yung mga iniba ko. pakialamero. PAK YU! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.57.96.1 (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh-huh. Well okay then. ;-) CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:56, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you remove this entry. Basically the thing says in Tagalog. (heading)Son of a whore!(heading), stop interfering (profanity) (profanity). Stop reverting my changes! meddler. FUCK YOU! (Tagalog romanization). I hope I don't incur an WP:NPA violation. I'm merely informing you what this personal attack means--Lenticel ^(talk) 12:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote in the 2008 Wikimedia Board Election

Hey there. I'm a member of the 2008 Board Election Committee. Unfortunately, due to some technical problems at the start of the election, the ballot that you submitted is invalid. Could you please visit Special:Boardvote and vote again? Your prior (invalid) ballot will be automatically replaced with your new one. Thanks for your patience. - Mark 07:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of Michael Ritchie

There was a page history before the advertising. I think the disambiguation page should be restored. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember my question?

Back in April here to jog your hard working memory, i know your extremely busy on here. Well, looking at the list of Wikipedians by edits reveals that 175,884 registered people inc. bots edited Wikipedia in that month (until 23 May). Given there are more than 7 million registered users on here, i guess its a small Wikipedia world after all:) Take Care Roadrunnerz45 ^{(talk 2 me)} 10:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cascading protection, Barack Obama

Is there a log or forum anywhere indicating a request, rationale and intended length of time for the cascading protection of the Barack Obama? It is impairing the editing of linked templates relating to the presidential articles. A little like an ant colony in amber. Multiple items frozen in time.
I see that the controllng pages are

User:Nakon/p and
User:East718/PTT

Thanks, Yellowdesk (talk) 13:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was recent template vandalism which resulted in many articles related to Barack Obama to be vandalised. I'll go ahead and remove the protection as it appears that the article is under control for now. You'll have to contact User:East718 to get him to remove his protection as well. Nakon 15:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.
Was there a noticeboard item as well?
-- Yellowdesk (talk) 23:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

user:Daynal

It would appear that the user Daynal has been deleted under the rubrics of 'normal housekeeping'. What becomes of the talk page associated with the user, and is deletion for normal housekeeping considered an automatic function?

--75.105.7.0 (talk) 06:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it is in the temporary category, it will eventually be deleted. Nakon 13:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It would appear then to be open to reuse by others. Is this correct?--72.250.232.242 (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting a user page does not actually delete the user from the database. The user's contributions still exist and as a result the user account may not be reregistered. Nakon 21:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again! Then the invitation to open a new account "Log in or create an account to start the User:Daynal page" is not capable of being accepted? If true, then the objective of the user will have been accomplished. If not, other means will have to be explored. Any further thoughts?--75.104.136.41 (talk) 03:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage revert

Thanks! --M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 04:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imposters

Just wanted to let you know you had 2 imposters (User:Nakon2 & User:Nakon3). Their accounts were created via SUL.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 06:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These accounts were created by me. Thanks for noticing. Nakon 13:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove my name from the Wikimedia nomail list.

I don't have an account there, neither do many others. We were spammed through e-mail, and I'll be damned if I have to sign up for an account just to put my name on a Do-Not-Spam list. Half the edits there are from IPs that don't want to bother to sign up for the site. The spam email said nothing about having to jump through hoops just to get off the list. I do not want to have to check the stupid list every day to make sure it wasn't removed by you or someone else. Do not remove our names. SashaNein (talk) 12:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With SUL, people can log in without registering. I removed the names because they could have been added by anyone. If you notice later, I readded everyone. Nakon 13:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bots and stuff

Ohai! Are you per chance running a copy of my adminbot? Just wondering, because you-know-who was boasting on ED yesterday about his stunt and how the two of us have apparently stopped our bots "confident" in ClueBot. Incidentally, I have accidentally introduced a bug into the code a few days ago (that prevented the pagemove blocker from working; it's fixed now), so figured it might be related. Миша 13 17:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I usually run a custom script written in PHP, but for safety reasons I only run it when I'm online. Nakon 21:11, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PAKIALAMERO KA!

HA HUNTNGIN DI KITA! TANGINA MO! 216.57.96.1 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you speak Tagalog? Thank you for helping us revert vandalisms and clearing up insulsts posted at my page. I am just wondering how you figured out that one is vandalism. Ang hey looks like you also had some insults from vandals too. It means in Tagalog: "I shall hunt for you! Your mother's a bitch!" Thanks again.-- Felipe Aira 10:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

differences in post

hi. i created an entry for a new firm in malaysia similar to firms like weber shandwick and hill and knowlton but you deleted it for advertising?? please explain how this is different from their entries?

Please see WP:COI and WP:ADVERT. Nakon 04:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks. I think I know what you mean - will edit and resubmit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arciscommunications (talk • contribs) 04:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are indefblocked users supposed to be removed from guestbooks? Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 18:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the point of keeping them around. Nakon 18:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was that block based on a checkuser? xenocidic (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DUCK. Nakon 18:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragon Quest VIII characters

Dear Nakon, I respectfully request that you reconsider this closure. The article was in the process of revisions and the discussion itself was marred by what are really "I don't like it" comments by accounts unwilling to even considering arguing to keep in AfDs, i.e. unwilling to acknowledge the revision efforts (please notice, for example, these comments made elsewhere by some participants in that discussion: [1], [2], [3], etc.). It is obviously hard to convince anyone who says their "mission" or "goal" is to delete or who regard those arguing to keep such articles as "acne-ridden mongoloid fanboys obsessed with keeping every single piece of crap." Thus, I am concerned that such discussions as this one do not reflect an actual neutral or unbiased consensus. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 06:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRV will be the proper place to go. Nakon 13:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for the reply. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 15:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for List of Dragon Quest VIII characters

An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of Dragon Quest VIII characters. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 16:00, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Irish names

Please do not delete relevant additions to talk pages such as the Irish names I added.[4][5] This is a legitimate topic of discission (see here for a previous example of discussion by other users) and no unsourced info was added to the mainspace. The translations I added are taken from a poor quality source (itself unsourced) and should not be added to the article without additional confirmation. But they are legitimate for a talk page to inspire others to help confirm them. Thanks. Irish Name (talk) 18:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an issue with it being added to Theobald Wolfe Tone, but it certainly doesn't need to be canvassed to the talk page of anyone who has an Irish-sounding surname (especially individuals who are not native Irish or who do not speak Gaelic). We don't automatically do that for other surnames; there's no need to do it for Irish ones. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not automatic but it is common even for other languages. For example, Lynn Chen's Chinese is prominently displayed in mainspace despite being born and raised in the United States. I was only adding these names to the talk page. If you think that's not an appropriate subject for discussion, please change the talk page rules but don't summarily delete entries. Irish Name (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ildatch

Will you please transpose what was on this page to Talk:Shannara artifacts so that I can combine the two in Shannara artifacts#Ildatch. the_ed 17 19:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is available at User:Nakon/b. Nakon 20:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. the_ed 17 02:46, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I jumped the gun a bit

I'm afraid that the problems with this user are way deeper than I thought at first. --Enric Naval (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Torture Never Stops

I've been trying to edit The Torture Never Stops article and it either gets deleted or someone has a problem while I'm trying to edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misnomer1 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A1 Nakon 00:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roadfan

You closed this two and a half hours ago, but the article roadfan remains as it was. Was this intentional, or should something else be done? --NE2 04:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Ananny

The article for an AfD you closed was recreated verbatim. I've speedied it, but the editor removed the tag and has been warned. She believes that consensus was to keep. I've tried explaining how AfDs work, but you may want to weigh in. Thanks. freshacconcispeaktome 01:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted and salted. I'll inform the editor of DRV. Nakon 02:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The whole thing was a bit of a prolonged drama of sorts. Cheers. freshacconcispeaktome 02:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Terry ananny

She's at it again! freshacconcispeaktome 02:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CEO Jeffrey Beach Page

Hello, I was just working on a page about a CEO of an american company and was in the process of adding a lot more information to it. Can you please undelete the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by D453g (talk • contribs) 04:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Candy Coated Killahz

   ==Deletion review for Candy Coated Killahz==

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Candy Coated Killahz. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Buddybudee (talk) 03:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing personal. I'm sure you were just in the habit of deleting excessive non-notable bands. But this is a notable band that is playing the upcoming monolith festival in Denver, with coverage by multiple reliable secondary sources. I don't have much information as of yet, but I think other wikipedians will be able to expand it even if all they do is consult the sources in the deleted article. Thanks. Buddybudee (talk) 03:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mott (live oak)

Hey. You closed this discussion, but the AfD tag is still on the article. I don't know how transwikis are done, but I would think that the AfD tag should come off if the discussion is closed. Corvus cornix_talk 22:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Democracy and Workers' Rights Center

Did you ever consider putting a notice warning of the possibility of speedy deletion before butchering away? I wrote the DWRC entry in 5 minutes, went back to edit 25 seconds later, to ADD significance, and it was gone. Not nice. LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 06:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my habit to be so abrupt. I just thought a little warning was due, given how very very speedy you were. Please explain why you think the article is not worthy? Do you still think so, even after explaining its relationship with the PGFTU? Thanks, LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 07:23, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

Code Name: Desert Hunt

it's basically an RPG that is starting out. It's got some unique features, but I have to say that we started this wiki page rather haphazardly and as such I wrote this article more or less alone. The plan was to have most of our members update it over the course of the following day... but...

anyhow, is it okay if we try again if we do a better job on the page showing how it's relevant etc.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bindoverbindo (talk • contribs) 06:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:WEB. Nakon 07:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxies

Hi Nakon, are you sure you don't want to hardblock those open proxies? With people like Grawp (and likely many other blocked/banned users) who use them, allowing registered users doesn't stop it. And with WP:IPEXEMPT, there's less need to allow registered users. Spellcast (talk) 01:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing, I had totally forgot about that. Nakon 01:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thx. Spellcast (talk) 01:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pagemove block

No problem. Thanks for the note; I was wondering what had happened. :) U (talk) 05:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Adminbots

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Adminbots. Could you help with the list on the talk page? Carcharoth (talk) 23:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kiesby

To my annoyance this has been deleted. Can you explain why this topic has been deleted please??? As i live in Kiesby and last time i looked it wasn't a figment of my imagination, unless the last 37 years have been. FYI it is an actual village in rural lincolnshire(thats in the UK!), check it out on a map my son- you may well be surprised!!

Can it be re-instated? or am i going to have to remake it??

Thanks for your very valuble time. Arnold I'm Back says arnie. (talk)

Question:

We're re-building that Code Name: Desert Hunt page... we admit that the first time through we didn't do a good job of showing why it needed to be included on wikipedia, so we're trying to get more people to help us edit it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.173.45 (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St Radegund public house

Hi, could you tell me why St Radegund public house was deleted? It was apparently given 5 days with a proposed deletion notice, which is policy, but still seems a little short on an article that got less than 5 edits a year. As far as I can tell, no discussion was sought, and since I am not an admin, I can't see any details of the proposed deletion notice.

Could I request you copy the proposed deletion reason into the deletion summary for future deletions, for the benefit of non-admins? Thanks, --Ozhiker (talk) 16:48, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User committed identity + GPG fingerprint + Secure GW, but STILL banned from editing pages?

I keep getting blocked from adding some useful requested citations to a couple of pages about cellulosic ethanol yields and I'd like to suggest that universally blocking anonymizer.com users doesn't seem to make much sense. This is a legitimate commercial security solution which we pay for, and it is of the quality and reputation that one would hope clueful folks like Wikipedia would enthusiastically endorse.

I understand that the mods at Wikipedia have godlike powers and I'm duly fearful of being slapped down hard for even daring to raise such a question, but my point is not combative at all. I am merely suggesting that if I am willing to stand by my every keystroke entered on the site, it seems I should also have the right to protect every bit in transit to and from the site and my strongly authenticated identity. Am I completely out of line on that suggestion?

I now have a mondo WHIRLPOOL User committed identity + GPG fingerprint + coming into the site on Secure Gateway. That seems like a pretty good safety net to me.

Look forward to learning your perspective. metavalent (talk) 08:28, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attack

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete Kingdom of Drakkar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.229.143 (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see MsTopeka

S/T

Could you please restore this page? It is an album and is ineligible for A7 speedy deletion. Chubbles (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kvrx1.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kvrx1.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinate block?

I noticed you deleted the page of an indefinately blocked user and I was curious about whom the information regarding the circumstances of user's blocks is available to. Tyciol (talk) 01:41, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marazene

I dont understand ur deletion of our page? we are legitimate entity...

started in 2001 and still going strong with international releases and significant north american touring.

www.myspace.com/marazene

About deleted article : "Shree TR Boarding School"

Hello Sir/Madam, I was really surprised to see that the article titled "Shree TR Boarding School" was deleted from wikipedia. I dont see any genuine reason to delete this article. Could you please write to me the reason for deleting this article.

I am looking forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely, GN Sharma. (lakurikodai@yahoo.com)

In Dec. 2006 you deleted "Capstrat" can you please explain why? Steven Keith (stevenkeith@gmail.com) Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenkeith (talk • contribs) 15:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]