User talk:MasscomAlight

Disclosure

I disclose that i am not a paid user and i am not connected to any company or any individual. I contribute to Wikipedia as neutral point of view. MasscomAlight (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello MasscomAlight. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Razorpay, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MasscomAlight. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MasscomAlight|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 13:49, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atal Ranking of Institutions on Innovation Achievements moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Atal Ranking of Institutions on Innovation Achievements, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your page to draft space (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on it with minimal disruption. When you feel that it meets our notability and neutrality requirements, and is thus ready for mainspace, please submit it using the Articles for Creation template on the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atal Ranking of Institutions on Innovation Achievements

Hello, MasscomAlight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atal Ranking of Institutions on Innovation Achievements, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:04, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]