User talk:Marekchelsea

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have taken an interest in the presentation of individuals' nations, particularly footballers. You may be interested to know that from an encyclopaedic and constructive angle, a greater number of editors and readers appreciate historical accuracy, which is why these now defunct countries (eg. Yugoslavia, USSR etc.) are mentioned in some form. To date, all of your edits have been reverted; although I personally ammended most, there were a few which were reverted by other editors before I discovered them. By all means be constructive, and if you are familiar with information regarding these Croatian footballers which is lacking, be bold and edit freely. But for the meantime, please observe the practice of historical accuracy and abstain from removing old national names. Alter them if you will by ammending the order or the emphasis; present them in such a way that you are happy, but please do not delete the old national names. If you encounter problems of any kind, I will be pleased to help you. Best wishes. Evlekis (talk) 22:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Marekchelsea, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Gman124^talk 17:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Thomasz Wylenzek. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LAA Fan 16:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Category:Italian-Slovenians‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 11:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages while CFD is ongoing is inapproriate

As long as there's an ongoing discussion moving article into the proposed new category is not appropriate. Also, signing category pages the way you have[1][2][3][4][5] is also not something that should be done. Do you think you could clean up these edits? __meco (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ziggy Rozalski

A tag has been placed on Ziggy Rozalski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Theseeker4 (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Slovenians of Bosnian descent, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Plessis

I have undone your edit to Damien Plessis stating that he's a Reunion footballer, as there is no sourced mention of that in the article. If you have a source, please provide it, and add some prose to the article rather than just adding another category. Thanks.

Hi, sorry, but i've undone it again. Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, especially when the claim, in this case on fr.wikipedia is unsourced. Can you find a source on a club website or interview (n French is fine) that says where his ancestry is. --Ged UK 10:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Cristiano Ronaldo Real 3471149.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your Poland-related contributions

Hello and welcome Marekchelsea! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with our community.

--_{Jniech (talk)} 22:55, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A polite notification

If you have any problems with my edits, you are most welcome to use my talk page to discuss them. I would be most grateful if you could refrain from calling my edits "sick". Thank you.Varsovian (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Ginczek

The newspaper article says, his grandparents were born in Silesia, it says nothing about a Polish background. Daniel Ginczek was born in 1991, let's assume his grandparents were older than 45 years at that time → they were born prior to 1945. Millions of Germans were born in Silesia prior to 1945, to call them or their grandchildren "of Polish descent" is absurd. Please find a ref for your claim or stop it. 84.139.251.125 (talk) 19:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Hupka, Herbert Czaja and Rudi Pawelka - these names all sound "Polish" but they are not. Please don't use the sound of names for Polonizing people. 84.139.241.70 (talk) 12:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Poles from Lithuania

I have nominated Category:Poles from Lithuania (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on content

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 10#Category:Poles_from_Lithuania. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Czeszcz

Hey Marek, dotyczących notatki do Darwinka [6], prosimy o kontakt ze mną za wskazówki i pomoc, gdy potrzebujesz. Dr. Dan (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poland U19

Dlaczego usunąłeś ze składu Kas(z?)aka? PS11 (talk) 11:36, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, nie zauważyłem, dzięki za poprawę. Przerzuciłem się wczoraj z plwiki na enwiki bo mi się już tam znudziło i widzę, że ty to samo zrobiłś:) PS11 (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arka Gdynia

Pomożesz mi tworzyć hasła o wszystkich graczach polskiej Ekstraklasy? Idę po kolei alfabetem najpierw robię z Arki Gdynia, przy okazji zamieniam też infoboxy na te lepsze i aktualizuję. PS11 (talk) 16:32, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patrz mój userpage, jeśli piłkarz zagrał w większej liczbie pkt po prostu daj years7, clubs7, caps7 itd. Napisz do mnie na gg jeśli możesz. PS11 (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ekstraklasa

Oczywiście, mogę pomóc. DK4]]$4^(Contribs) 14:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello, please do not copy/paste articles as you did here [7][8], as it makes article history a mess. Also please be advised not to mark major or controversial edits as mirror ones as it is considered disruptive, ideally use edit summaries. Cheers, M.K. (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For your consideration

For your consideration: [9]. M.K. (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of references.

FYI, in wikipedia references are not for removal. From now on I watch your contribution. If you continue deleting info and references just because you don't like the info they carry, this will go to administration. I hope I was clear. Ales hurko (talk) 00:37, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article with removed references:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=W%C5%82adys%C5%82aw_Syrokomla&diff=prev&oldid=356794025 Ales hurko (talk) 01:20, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your quote from my talk page: «

I don't remove any references,check links, everything is fine»

I know your tricks. You did not remove references but you did remove the information that was referenced. Result is the same - false information.

And please, if a question/notice was started on your talk page, answer there. Ales hurko (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General Sanctions

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Digwuren#Final decision. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Polish footballers

Hello. I noticed that you've created a number of articles about Polish footballers. In the future, please consider adding {{WikiProject Poland}} to such articles' Talk pages. If you'd like, you can also "assess" the article's class (usually stub or start) and importance (usually low). Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Mickiewicz

Hi, i just wanted to know how the name Adam Mickiewicz is pronounced. yes, a listen link is there at the article; but i am getting a feeling it isn't accurate. Moreover, I do not know to read the phonetic language. My doubt appeared because i have heard a lot of people pronouncing as Adam Meikkevski especially in my part of the world. So, i was thinking since you are a native speaker of Polish whether you could verify this. Thank You Arjun^codename024 11:33, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marekchelsea. You have new messages at Arjun024's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arjun^codename024 12:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference in Jan Chachot article

I have removed your reference, Tygodnik ilustrowany Wilno 1859 r., Słownik Geogr., Przewodnik; Szlakiem Adama Mickiewicza po Nowogródczyźnie, Wilnie i Kownie -T. Krzywicki, because it does not state that Chachot is Polish.

This is where I found out:

http://www.genealogia.okiem.pl/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=787

I have read over this article several times and I didn't find the fact that you were trying to prove. Just because this is a Polish encyclopedia (or whatever) it doesn't make Jan Chachot a Pole. Ales Hurko (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Football transfers

Please note that football transfers currently being announced by German clubs do not take affect until the transfer window opens on 1 July. Please do not modify the current squad temaplate for German clubs until then. Thanks. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:41, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

– vs -

Hi there MAREK, VASCO from Portugal here,

Please do not replace – with the smaller - in boxes of players, as you did in Manú (footballer), it's there for a reason. Please respect other people's work, and the same will be done with yours.

Happy editing - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as you did in Andreu Guerao Mayoral, don't remove the geographic region in his birthplace in INTRO, it's additional info, i am not saying Catalonia is a country. And (also PLEASE) do not link dates of birth. Thank you - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Antônio Guedes Filho

Witam! Marcelo dzisiaj ma przechodzić testy medyczne w PSV, jak je przejdzie i zostanie podane do wiadomości że zmienił oficjalnie klub, to można go wtedy zmienić w jego artykule. Nie ma się co napalać, spokojnie. Pozdrawiam.--Oleola (talk) 11:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hi, just letting you know that you now have the autopatrolled userright, as it was requested by Ironholds (talk · contribs), a new page patroller. Keep up the good work! J Milburn (talk) 01:10, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bemben

Witaj. On używa imienia Michael. Czy przekierowałbyś Lukas Podolski pod Łukasz Podolski, Miroslav Klose pod Mirosław Kloze, albo Gregor Podeschwa pod Grzegorz Podeszwa? Tu jest ta sama sytuacja, Twoje przenoszenie pod Michał Bemben było niezgodne z prawdą. Pozdrawiam Yurek88 (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nie interesuje mnie, jak jest na oficjalnej stronie Górnika. Podolski może sobie w domu używać imienia Łukasz, ale oficjalnie jest Lukasem. [10], [11], [12], [13]. Yurek88 (talk) 22:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tomasz Kupisz

OK. W takim razie wpisałem ten mecz w rubryce Career.

--ArkadiuszEurope (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Dzięki serdeczne za porady. Pozdrawiam.

--ArkadiuszEurope (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pomoc w robieniu artykulow i aktualizacji zawodnikow Polskiej 1 ligi(dawnej drugiej) czyli Polish First League

Powodzenia przy aktualizacji artykułów, ja niestety nie mam zbyt dużo wolnego czasu, aby się w to zaangażować.--Oleola (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spróbuj napisać do PS.--Oleola (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First League

Od czasu do czasu będę coś edytował, jak będę miał czas. Ale szczerze mówiąc wolę zrobić póki co trzy tabelki bokserskie - do Andrzeja Gołoty, Dariusza Michalczewskiego i Wojciecha Bartnika.

Pozdrawiam.

--ArkadiuszEurope (talk) 11:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Niestety ale wolę edytować polską Wikipedię, na enwiki poprawiam tylko błędy, które znajdę albo cofam czasem wandalizmy. To właśnie na plwiki ludzie czytają o wiele częściej hasła o polskich zawodnikach lub grających w Polsce a poza tym polski znam o wiele bardziej niż angielski i szybciej piszę hasła. Mówię Ci, chodź do plwiki :) To nic, że mamy bardziej rygorystyczyne kryteria i większość zawodników I ligi jest nieency, plwiki jest lepsza pod wieloma względami. PS. (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poprostu na plwiki jest więcej delecjonistów. Mi tam te kryteria nie przeszkadzają, ale jeśli nie chcesz to nie musisz, nie nalegam. PS. (talk) 13:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Tu znowu ja. Zrobiłem sobie odpoczynek od plwiki, więc mogę ci pomóc w tworzeniu i poprawianiu tych haseł ;) PS. (talk) 13:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muszę się trochę przyzwyczaić, bo np. zapomniałem w dwóch moich dzisiejszych hasłach dodać banerów do dyskusji. PS. (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC) PS Mógłbyś może podać mi twój nr GG albo napisać na mój (jest na moim userpage na plwiki)? Będzie nam się łatwiej komunikować jak coś. PS. (talk) 18:41, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mógłbyś może jeszcze raz do mnie napisać? Stało mi się coś z GG i straciłem twój nr PS. (talk) 10:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ekstraklasa jeszcze nieskończona przecież. PS. (talk) 10:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No tak, zależy co mi się chce. PS. (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Racja

Witam ponownie Tak przy okazji zobaczyłem Twoją dyskusję z użytkownikiem PS. Masz rację, ja też z tego samego powodu postanowiłem działać na angielskiej Wikipedii. Na polskiej usunęli mi 19 z 25 artykułów napisanych przeze mnie. Na angielskiej tylko raz tak się zdarzyło, ale ponownie go napisałem i jest git. Pozdrawiam. --ArkadiuszEurope (talk) 22:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan Stulin

The article Alan Stulin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who is yet to play a match in a fully-professional competition

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns about discrimination and hatred

For your information Wikipedia is not a place for nationalism, hatred and discrimination of ethnic groups. I know that you feel very angry towards Belarusians and because of that you are ready to remove every info related to Belarusians and thus presenting inadequate material.

These are your edits I am concerned about:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Ogi%C5%84ski_family&diff=prev&oldid=392256799

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Ostrogski_family&diff=prev&oldid=392256742

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Sapieha_family&diff=prev&oldid=392256686

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Radziwi%C5%82%C5%82_family&diff=prev&oldid=392256507

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Radziwi%C5%82%C5%82_family&diff=prev&oldid=392256090

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chodkiewicz_family&diff=392257331&oldid=391965439

If it happens again, this will go into the administration. You have to remember that this is a neutral encyclopedia, not Wikipedia of Poland. You have been warned.

Ales Hurko (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If a question or notice was started on your page answer there please.

This is what you wrote on my talk page: At that time people were Ruthenians not belarusians, you,re wrong, add category with ruthenians! --marekchelsea (talk) 08:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My response to it:

Really? I am sorry to say but you are the one who is wrong here. If you disagree then I would like you to get familiar with the following literature:

«Богуславский В. Белорусы // Славянская энциклопедия. XVII век. М., ОЛМА-ПРЕСС. 2004» Quotation: «Белорусы — восточнославянский народ, сформировавшийся в XIV—XVI вв. на западных землях бывшей терр. Киевской Руси».
«Этническая история Беларуси XIX - начала XX в.: В контексте Центрально-Восточной Европы»http://pawet.net/files/ceraskowich.pdf

Ales Hurko (talk) 19:45, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Running Man Barnstar

		The Running Man Barnstar
		For your continuing coverage of sport biographies, I, Piotrus, awared you The Running Man Barnstar. The Running Man Barnstar may be awarded for distinguished efforts in sports-related articles. This barnstar is intended for those who give 110% in order to advance Wikipedia's coverage of the world of sports. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus\| talk} 16:47, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Persondata

Zobacz WP:PERSONDATA :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 15:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class

		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
		On behalf of WP:WikiProject Poland, it is my pleasure to award you this barnstar in recognition of your articles concerning Polish sports. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to Marekchelsea by — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk on 05:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

Daniel Ginczek (again)

Your edit summary here "he has dual polish-german nationality" directly contradicts the statement of the man in question in a source linked to this article (this one). Regardless of what transfermarkt may or may not say, the words of the subject of an article as to what passports he does and does not have are a far more reliable source. --Varsovian (talk) 13:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to remove sourced information regarding the subject's refusal to play for a national team other than the German one and the facts that he does not have a passport other than German and does not speak a language other than German. In addition to that, and your constant insertion of disputed facts and removal of sourced info giving the other side of that disputed facts, you are also breaking WP:BIO. If you continue to removed sourced information and push a nationalist point of view, I will regrettably be forced to request that the sanctions which you have been notified of are enforced. Varsovian (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Varsovian, you are currently banned from Eastern European topics. As such you have no business commenting here about a EE related article, particularly one on which you edited war extensively before. You especially have no business issuing warnings to other users, threatening them with sanctions or making personal attacks. Volunteer Marek (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GG

Mógłbyś napisać do mnie na gg? Bo nie mam już twojego nr. PS. (talk) 21:06, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maor Melikson

Proponowałbym poczekać ze zmianami klubu zawodnikom do czasu, gdy zostanie to oficjalnie potwierdzone przez klub.--Oleola (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

90minut jak zwykle pospieszyło się z tą informacją, zasugerowało się zdjęciem na stronie izraelskiej. Pracownicy biura prasowego Wisły Kraków tak odpowiedzieli na donisienia o rzekomym zakontraktowaniu Meliksona:" Co my na to? Otóż zdradzimy Wam, że to zdjęcie robił Stan Valckx w poniedziałek rano w pawilonie medialnym w ramach zwiedzania stadionu z Maorem. Kew ma takie samo zdjęcie ze swoim menedżerem. I nie oznacza to, że umowy z zawodnikami zostały podpisane. Jak rzeczywiście tak będzie, to będzie informacja"

Tak więc na przyszłość musisz poczekać jak klub oficjalnie potwierdzi fakt dokonania transferu. News na 90minut nie jest tego wyznacznikiem, bo oni się zawsze spieszą, chcą pierwsi podać informację i czasami się ona później nie sprawdza, tak jak np. Korzym w Cracovii.--Oleola (talk) 18:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Felix Ogbuke

Dlaczego już po raz drugi usuwasz szablon refimprove nie dając żadnego refa? Potrzebne są WIARYGODNE źródła do tego czy rzeczywiście grał przede wszystkim w Al Wasl oraz Enugu Rangers.--Oleola (talk) 15:49, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janczyk

Korona tylko wypożyczyła Janczyka z CSKA. Nie kupiła go. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Omar Jarun, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 22:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Korona Kielce old vandalism help request

You were the last person to make a good edit to Korona's article before it was vandalised (by someone who's vandalised a few other articles); your last edit before vandalism is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Korona_Kielce&diff=next&oldid=400114009 .

I don't know anything about Korona and I don't want to revert the article incorrectly. Could you take a look and fix it?

Many thanks Christopher (talk) 23:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for checking and reverting Marek, appreciated. Christopher (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Ekstraklasa

Widzę, że też edytujesz polską piłkę. Może byśmy tak zrobili wspólnie hasła o każdym piłkarzu, który zagrał w Ekstraklasie (tak mniej więcej w ostatnich 10 latach)? Zauważyłem, że sporo piłkarzy brakuje. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Używanie takiej wersji zalecił mi GiantSnowman, więc dlatego takiego używam. Po co robić listę? Można np. na 90minut zobaczyć archiwalne sezony i pisać o brakujących zawodnikach. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 12:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skoro ci się nie chce, to nie ma problemu. Mogę sam powoli robić hasła, a ty zajmuj się I ligą, która mnie prawie w ogóle nie interesuje. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 12:51, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Daty

Ale taki jest międzynarodowy format, miesiąc dzień to wersja amerykańska. Poza tym również w polskim używa się formatu dzień miesiąc, więc potencjalnym edytorom będzie łatwiej edytować (bo pewnie większość to Polacy). Te dodatkowe zakładki są niepotrzebne, jeśli piłkarz zmieni klub to się je doda, nie muszą być w haśle cały czas. Nie cofaj moich edycji. Taka wersja infoboksu jest o wiele czytelniejsza. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 17:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC) A i jeszcze jedno. Skąd wiesz, że pełne imię i nazwisko Iwana to Andrzej Iwan? Może ma jakieś drugie imię? TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 17:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja nie psuję twojej pracy, ja tylko poprawiam hasła o piłkarzach Ekstraklasy bo chcę je wszystkie ujednolicić. Praktycznie wszyscy byli polscy piłkarze mają format dzień miesiąc (m.in. Grzegorz Lato, Andrzej Juskowiak, Jan Tomaszewski, Kazimierz Deyna) poza piłkarzami ekstraklasy stworzonymi przez Ciebie. Mówisz, że ja psuję twoją pracę, a sam również zmieniasz format dat w hasłach jak w Tomaszu Frankowskim. A odpowiesz na moje pytanie dotyczące pełnego imienia i nazwiska? Z jakiego źródła korzystasz je dodając? TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Karier nie będę pisał, bo nie znam angielskiego aż tak dobrze. A dodawanie po jednym, dwóch zdań do hasła nie ma sensu, i tak nikt tego nie czyta, infoboksy co innego. Chociaż nie ukrywam fajnie bybyło gdyby każde hasło o piłkarzu wyglądało tak jak to o Bencie (jeden z moich ulubionych angielskich grajków). A przypisy do czego mam dodawać skoro jest link do 90minut? Robię na Wikipedii to co mi się podoba, poprawiam infoboksy na lepszy wygląd, aktualizuję hasła, robię sporo drobnych zmian. Jak sam mój nick mówi jestem fanem całej piłki nożnej, a nie tylko polskiej, więc nie skupiam na niej swojej głównej uwagi. Jeśli chodzi o polską ligę to chcę ujednolicić wszystkie hasła oraz co tydzień je aktualizować, bo bardzo lubię gdy hasła są bardzo aktualne. Odpowiesz mi na pytanie dotyczące pełnego imienia i nazwiska? A tak w ogóle jeśli mówisz, że dużo haseł jest gołych, to może byśmy wzięli się porządnie za jedno hasło o polskim piłkarzu i doprowadzili je do takiej postaci jak Bent (do statusu Good Article)? Źródeł jest sporo, więc nie byłoby problemu. A potem ewentualnie inne. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Skoro nie masz źródła do pełnego imienia i nazwiska to dlaczego je dodajesz? Sporo osób ma drugie imiona, jeśli chodzi o to hasło to proponuję Lewandowskiego, potem Błaszczykowskiego i Piszczka - trzech najbardziej znanych polskich piłkarzy :P Można też robić wszystkie na raz po trochu. Proponuję stworzyć dla każdego oddzielny brudnopis, pisać w nim po angielsku a po polsku w komentarzach http (  He plays for Borussia) TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 19:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Lewandowski

Stworzyłem User:TheBiggestFootballFan/Robert Lewandowski. Jeśli możesz ulepszaj ze mną ten artykuł. Nad angielskimi zdaniami jest polskie tłumaczenie, co widać w trybie edycji hasła. TheBiggestFootballFan (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 80,000 pages as Poland-related, out of which 1,500 still need a quality assessment, and 20,000, importance assessment.
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ.
once an article is assessed it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is another good place to watchlist!)
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on
newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, and its creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project
we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Football transfers

Please note that football transfers currently being announced do not take affect until the transfers window opens on 1 July. Please do not edit current squad sections of club articles to reflect these transfers until then. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patryk Podrygała

The article Patryk Podrygała has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krzysztof Kasak

The article Krzysztof Kasak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro leauge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paweł Waśków

The article Paweł Waśków has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro leauge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Przemysław Jastrzębski

The article Przemysław Jastrzębski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro leauge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomasz Ptak

The article Tomasz Ptak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro leauge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paweł Tarnowski

The article Paweł Tarnowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paweł Łączny

The article Paweł Łączny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paweł Łączny

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paweł Łączny, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://5klatek.pl/?Lang=gb&Location=frontend&Module=archive&Activity=display.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:16, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transfery w polskiej lidze

Jeśli aktualizujesz hasło o zawodniku, szablon ze składem zespołu to staraj się też aktualizować sekcję "Current squad" w haślie o klubie. Fajnie jakby wszystko było aktualne :) Pozdrawiam Bubas (talk) 15:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Marekchelsea! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Proposed deletion of Dawid Krieger

The article Dawid Krieger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Maciej Wilusz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Maciej Wilusz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sebastian Kmieć

The article Sebastian Kmieć has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sebastian Latowski

The article Sebastian Latowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alan Stulin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alan Stulin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paweł Waśków for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paweł Waśków is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paweł Waśków until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. When you recently edited Alan Stulin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wallace Benevente

The article Wallace Benevente has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Daniel Dybiec

The article Daniel Dybiec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patryk Koziara

The article Patryk Koziara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcin Stańczyk

The article Marcin Stańczyk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grzegorz Piesio

The article Grzegorz Piesio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian Nnamani

The article Christian Nnamani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcin Kalkowski

The article Marcin Kalkowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paweł Socha

The article Paweł Socha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christian Nnamani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Nnamani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Nnamani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcin Zarychta

The article Marcin Zarychta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cheikh Tidiane Niane

The article Cheikh Tidiane Niane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kamil Nitkiewicz

The article Kamil Nitkiewicz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Konrad Forenc

The article Konrad Forenc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Damian Pawlak

The article Damian Pawlak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patryk Kubicki

The article Patryk Kubicki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrian Frańczak

The article Adrian Frańczak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:56, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Łukasz Radliński

The article Łukasz Radliński has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alain Ngamayama

The article Alain Ngamayama has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jakub Szałek

The article Jakub Szałek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members!

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages?
- assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide.
once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions.
you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content)
we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here.
also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!).
did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content.
we are maintaining a Portal:Poland
automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s)
Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details.

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :)

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland.
Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings.
Newsletter prepared by _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

Proposed deletion of Nildo França Junior

The article Nildo França Junior has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eivinas Zagurskas

The article Eivinas Zagurskas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:55, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Alain Ngamayama

Draft:Alain Ngamayama, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Alain Ngamayama and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Alain Ngamayama during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of André Jordan Spitzman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on André Jordan Spitzman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Zawisza Bydgoszcz squad

Template:Zawisza Bydgoszcz squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 19:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kolejarz Stróże squad

Template:Kolejarz Stróże squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Flota Świnoujście squad

Template:Flota Świnoujście squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 19:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dolcan Ząbki squad

Template:Dolcan Ząbki squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 19:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ruch Radzionków squad

Template:Ruch Radzionków squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Kq-hit (talk) 19:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 10:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Marekchelsea. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Marekchelsea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krystian Żołnierewicz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krystian Żołnierewicz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AfD discussion title until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jogurney (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:French-Polish footballers has been nominated for merging to Category:French footballers

Category:French-Polish footballers has been nominated for merging to Category:French footballers. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 15:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:KSZO Ostrowiec squad

Template:KSZO Ostrowiec squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 06:31, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomasz Magdziarz

The article Tomasz Magdziarz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find SIGCOV outside of databases which explain why he's notable. GNG fail unless contrasting evidence can be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 21:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Czyszczon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Czyszczon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Czyszczon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]